2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel analytical method for the placement and sizing of distributed generation unit on distribution networks with and without considering P and PQV buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table 9, it is observed that the total real power loss of the system is significantly reduced and the minimum system voltage has improved from 0.8776 at bus 65 to 0.9925 at bus 61 when DGs are placed as per SMO technique which is best in comparisons with GA, analytical method, 34 and hybrid approach. 35 Bus voltages before and after optimal DG allocation in the system under consideration by proposed techniques are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Improvement Of System Operating State By Optimal Allocatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Table 9, it is observed that the total real power loss of the system is significantly reduced and the minimum system voltage has improved from 0.8776 at bus 65 to 0.9925 at bus 61 when DGs are placed as per SMO technique which is best in comparisons with GA, analytical method, 34 and hybrid approach. 35 Bus voltages before and after optimal DG allocation in the system under consideration by proposed techniques are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: Improvement Of System Operating State By Optimal Allocatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical approach proposed in Tah and Das 34 In Tah and Das, 34 a DG unit is placed at bus k, and it is shown that maximum loss reduction will occur in the branches from the source bus to the bus k where DG is connected. The optimal size of DG at unity power factor is given as 34…”
Section: Standard Techniques Of Dg Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative of this approach is that feeders are loading with uniformly distributed loads, centrally distributed loads, or increasingly distributed loads which is not the practical case. With the same objective as that of the Wang and Nehrir, different authors have proposed different approaches such as power stability index (PSI), sensitivity of line loss, sensitivity of combined power loss, voltage stability index (VSI), sensitivity of branch loss, active power loss sensitivity factor (LSF), and AE that minimises the losses of active and reactive component of line/branch currents to solve the OADG problem. Gopiya Naik SN et al has suggested the AE that have been derived based on change in active and reactive components of branch currents caused by DG to address the OADG problem with the aim of minimisation of both real and reactive power losses of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 Further, the AE methods are of two-stage optimisation problems that can be classified into two types. In the first type of AEs [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] : First stage-optimal location(s) is determined based on the AEs; Second stage-optimal DG size is determined using a repeated search approach. On the other hand, in the second type of AEs [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] : First stage-DG size at all the buses is determined based on AE; Second stage-the repeated search is applied to find both optimal location and size of DG that optimises the objective function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation