2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2020.2978983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Analytical Weighting Factor Tuning Strategy Based on State Normalization and Variable Sensitivity Balance for PMSM FCS-MPTC

Abstract: (UoL). He has published 65 papers in IEEE Transactions journals. His research interests include renewable generation, power electronics converters & control, electric vehicle, more electric ship/aircraft, smart energy system and non-destructive test technology. He is the associate editor of IET Renewable Power Generation, IET Intelligent Transport Systems and Power Electronics and Drives. Mingyao Ma (M'11) received the B.Sc. and Ph.D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, let us define the total cost function using the proposed approach. The proposed equal-weighted cost function method can be applied by replacing the sub-terms in (25) and ( 26) into (8) as follows:…”
Section: Case Study: Design Of the Proposed Approach For Mpc Of Singl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Now, let us define the total cost function using the proposed approach. The proposed equal-weighted cost function method can be applied by replacing the sub-terms in (25) and ( 26) into (8) as follows:…”
Section: Case Study: Design Of the Proposed Approach For Mpc Of Singl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical and self-tuning methods have also emerged for auto-tuning weighting factors [22][23][24][25]. In [22], an auto-tuning approach is proposed for power electronics interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since all calculations required to accurately determine the optimal weighting factor are done online, these techniques generally increase the computational burden of the predictive control process. Methods employed in the literature include: tracking error optimization [7], [28], [29], [66]- [68], torque ripple optimization [69], [70], coefficient of variation [71], state normalization/variable sensitivity balance [72], look-up table [73], [74], grey relational analysis [75] and continuous function of pre-existing error [76]. To facilitate the optimal weight factor calculation for predictive torque and flux control in particular, algebraic methods are presented in [69], [77], and these are not computationallyintensive.…”
Section: B Non-ai-based Online Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ 1 and λ 2 are weighting factors to adjust the relative importance of each term versus the others. Several methods have been reported in literature for tuning the weighting factors [32][33][34][35][36] . The cost-function classification method will be used in this paper due to its simplicity [32] .…”
Section:    ˆ1mentioning
confidence: 99%