2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel and conventional embryo parameters as input data for artificial neural networks: an artificial intelligence model applied for prediction of the implantation potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the morula stage, partial compaction with excluded or extruded cells seems to have an adverse effect on blastulation, blastocyst morphology, and live births [ 59 ]. At the blastocyst stage, trophectoderm cell cycle length and blastocyst expanded diameter were described as independent variables that could discriminate implanted from non-implanted embryos [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the morula stage, partial compaction with excluded or extruded cells seems to have an adverse effect on blastulation, blastocyst morphology, and live births [ 59 ]. At the blastocyst stage, trophectoderm cell cycle length and blastocyst expanded diameter were described as independent variables that could discriminate implanted from non-implanted embryos [ 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, training models for embryo ranking should focus exclusively on embryo intrinsic features. These may include engineered features that measure specific embryo properties such as the appearance of pronuclei and fading timing (tPNa, tPNf), the number of pronuclei, pronuclei shape, symmetry [21, 22, 23] blastocyst expanded diameter and trophectoderm cell cycle length [24], temporal events [25, 26] and/or training deep neural networks on the raw images [13] while avoiding embryo-extrinsic clinical factors that are shared by the other sibling embryos within the cohort. Second, the ambiguity in the KID-N labels makes implantation prediction a sub-optimal optimization problem both in model training as well as in model evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bori and co-workers in a retrospective study including 637 patients who underwent eSBT, described how the use of an artificial neural network model can be applied in predicting implantation potential. The unique feature of this study was the description of novel morphokinetic features as well as utilizing commonly accepted markers and yielded an AUC value of 0.77 [Bori et al, 2020]. Subsequently, the same group published results from a retrospective study where they tested three artificial NN aimed to predict live births from euploid embryos by combining blastocyst morphology extracted from single static image.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%