2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel and potential chemical sensors for Au(III) ion detection and recovery in electric waste samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesoporous silica attracted attention because of its specific surface functionality, porous wall structure, biocompatibility, and hydrophilic design [13–22] . MSNSs (mesoporous silica nanospheres) were created and used as a scaffold for accommodating new ion chromophores in this study (Phimhb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mesoporous silica attracted attention because of its specific surface functionality, porous wall structure, biocompatibility, and hydrophilic design [13–22] . MSNSs (mesoporous silica nanospheres) were created and used as a scaffold for accommodating new ion chromophores in this study (Phimhb).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the pore volume of the MSNss was 0.699 cm 3 /g, while the pore volume of the Phimhb sensor was 0.559 cm 3 /g. The Phimhb sensor still has a high surface area because incorporating the chromophore Phimhb molecules into the mesoporous silica surface is physical adsorption (van der Waals adsorption) [13–22] . The fact that the Phimhb chromophore is conserved both outside and inside the nanosphere may explain why Phimhb sensors have smaller pore widths and surface areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, it is possible to determine ultra-traces of Fe­(III) ions using the two sensors with high sensitivity better than other spectrophotometric methods as shown in Table . This may be attributed to the use of mesoporous silica nanotube nanomaterial as a carrier that boosted the sensitive property of the immobilized reagents (formylsalicylic acids), resulting in the high sensitivity of the 3-fsa-MSNT and 5-fsa-MSNT sensors. , It appears from Table that the 5-fsa-MSNT sensor has a lower LOD than the 3-fsa-MSNT sensor, and this may be because the positions of the hydroxyl and carboxylic groups are farther from the formyl group in the 5-fsa-MSNT structure than in the 3-fsa-MSNT structure. This makes the hydroxyl and carboxylic groups in the 5-fsa-MSNTs directed to the solution and easily react with the Fe­(III) ions.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%