2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel anisotropic teleseismic body-wave tomography code AniTomo to illuminate heterogeneous anisotropic upper mantle: Part I — Theory and inversion tuning with realistic synthetic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slowness ( S 0 ) at the isotropic grid nodes and anisotropic parameters (i.e., A , B , and C ) at the anisotropic grid nodes are determined by tomographic inversion. Previous studies of anisotropic tomography linearize theoretical travel times by the first-order Taylor expansion referencing to a starting model and then iterate the calculation and generate a model sequence to approach the optimal model ( 11 13 , 17 , 33 ). These linearization methods are effective when (i) the starting model is close enough to the optimal model or (ii) the nonlinearity of the tomographic problem is weak, so that a linearization using the first-order Taylor series is accurate enough to approximate the theoretical model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Slowness ( S 0 ) at the isotropic grid nodes and anisotropic parameters (i.e., A , B , and C ) at the anisotropic grid nodes are determined by tomographic inversion. Previous studies of anisotropic tomography linearize theoretical travel times by the first-order Taylor expansion referencing to a starting model and then iterate the calculation and generate a model sequence to approach the optimal model ( 11 13 , 17 , 33 ). These linearization methods are effective when (i) the starting model is close enough to the optimal model or (ii) the nonlinearity of the tomographic problem is weak, so that a linearization using the first-order Taylor series is accurate enough to approximate the theoretical model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 ). In this case, the conventional linear methods may easily fail to converge to the optimal solution, unless initial models and parameters are chosen very carefully for the inversion ( 17 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a relation of 100 km thickness for every second of delay time, one obtains a thickness of 100-200 km for the anisotropic layer, which matches the observed thickness of the −V p layer. A well-known effect of azimuthal anisotropy is to retard nearvertically incident body waves (Hammond, 2014;Munzerová et al, 2018), thus providing a possible explanation for the anomalous −V p layer. Taken together, this suggests that the −V p layer in the lower European lithosphere is structurally anisotropic and may have accommodated viscous flow.…”
Section: Nature Of Low-velocity Domains In the Greatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in both computational seismology and seismic observations have led to the development of 3‐D high‐resolution tomographic images including depth‐dependent azimuthal and radial anisotropies in different tectonic regimes (e.g., Zhao, 2015), such as in subduction zones (e.g., Eberhart‐Phillips & Henderson, 2004; Ishise & Oda, 2005; Liu & Zhao, 2016, 2017; Wang & Zhao, 2008, 2012), continental regions (e.g., Huang & Zhao, 2013; Tian & Zhao, 2013; Wei et al, 2016), and a tectonically stable region (Munzarova et al, 2018). These extensive studies demonstrate that P wave anisotropic tomography is an effective and powerful technique to reveal 3‐D variations of seismic anisotropy in the crust and mantle, since it provides improved vertical resolution compared with SWS measurements (e.g., Zhao et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%