Background
Galactomannan (GM) testing using Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (Platelia AGM) from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) aids in early diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). Globally, only a minority of laboratories have the capability to perform on-site GM testing, necessitating accessible and affordable alternatives. Hence, we conducted a comparative evaluation of the new clarus Aspergillus GM enzyme immunoassay prototype (clarus AGM prototype) with Platelia AGM using BALF samples.
Methods
This is a single-center, prospective, cross-sectional study, where Platelia AGM testing was routinely performed followed by clarus AGM prototype testing in those with true positive or true negative AGM test results according to the 2020 EORTC/MSG and the 2024 FUNDICU consensus definitions. Descriptive statistics, ROC curve analysis, and Spearman’s correlation analysis were used to evaluate analytical performance of the clarus AGM prototype assay.
Results
This study enrolled 259 adult patients, of which 53 (20%) were classified as probable IPA, while 206 did not fulfill IPA-criteria. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong correlation between the two assays (rho = 0.727, p < 0.001). The clarus AGM prototype had a sensitivity of 96% (51/53) and a specificity of 74% (153/206) for differentiating probable versus no IPA when using the manufacturer recommended cut-off. ROC curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.901–0.971) for the clarus AGM prototype, while the Platelia AGM yielded an AUC of 0.918 (95% CI 0.876–0.959).
Conclusions
Clarus AGM prototype demonstrated a strong correlation and promising test performance, comparable to Platelia AGM, rendering it a viable alternative in patients at risk of IPA.