2008
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2008.070015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Automatic Modulation Classification Using Cumulant Features for Communications via Multipath Channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 263 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate correct values of cumulants, propagation channel impact must be taken into consideration. It is quantised through the coefficient β [29]. The scaling of cumulants values with β is done with purpose to compensate channel effects.…”
Section: Ss Algorithms In a Rayleigh Fading Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to estimate correct values of cumulants, propagation channel impact must be taken into consideration. It is quantised through the coefficient β [29]. The scaling of cumulants values with β is done with purpose to compensate channel effects.…”
Section: Ss Algorithms In a Rayleigh Fading Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CR must estimate channel coefficients and the coefficients β based on the received signal c(n). It is done by using higher order statistical elements, as it was shown in [29], [30]. This approach is much less complex comparing to different types of equalizers.…”
Section: Ss Algorithms In a Rayleigh Fading Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The error is computed as the percentage difference in estimated edge frequency to the real edge frequency of the channel for each simulation. The absolute average error (average of accuracy for all 3 channels over all the edges) in detecting the edge frequencies of all the channels are calculated by finding the sharp variations in the multiscale products P1234 for the multiscale product method [61] and in H2345 for the multiscale sums method [125,126]. It is found that the wavelets product method has an average accuracy of 98.9% for frequency edge estimation, while the wavelets multiscale sums method has an accuracy of 98.76% for the three channels considered in the design example.…”
Section: Multiscale Wavelet Product and Wavelet Sums Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where is the received symbol sequence whose modulation type and symbol energy are unknown. is the transmitted symbol sequence that corresponds to the modulation scheme , among the modulations to be classified which are denoted as   Most of the available literature on CR assumes the noise to be Gaussian in nature [50,101,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128]. However, when the data sample size is not sufficiently large, it may not constitute a Gaussian process even in the presence of AWGN.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%