“…Coating (for example by poly-l-lysine) to obtain stable nonpyrogenic MNP suspension [115] product homogeneity quality reduction by concentration gradients and hot spots in the reaction flask [25,51] enhanced quality due to homogeneous morphology, narrow size distribution [25,67,116] high within one bacteria strain but strain variation possible [52][53][54]95] reproducibility, production rate and scale-up capability significant batch to batch variations in size, morphology, and magnetic properties [25,111,[117][118][119], poor scaling up capability. A reported study from Lin et al showed a production rate of 4.73 g/h for microfluidic synthesis comparing to 1.4 g/h for conventional synthesis with the same conditions [89] continuous production, no batch-to-batch variation, high scale-up capability high at the defined environmental conditions [92], mg/(L • day) production rate [52], high scale-up capability, though challenging due to long term bacteriostatic growth conditions [38,40,46,78] clogging not applicable microchannel-wall blocking during nucleation or by agglomeration [77,104,[120][121][122] not applicable automation poor feasible/integratable [66,123,124] capability of online characterization not applicable for batch, though magnetic characterization of whole batches by magnetic particle spectroscopy is feasible parameter control and synthesis adjustment feasible during synthesis, control of magnetic parameters by magnetic particle spectroscopy [25,125] and NMR [126] cost low, common lab equipment expensive microreactor fabrication expensive specialized equipment…”