2023
DOI: 10.1080/15563650.2023.2259089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel biomarkers for drug-induced liver injury

Christopher Humphries,
James W. Dear
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ALT use in 2009 for evaluating drug-induced liver toxicity (DILI), and it remains integral to the FDA-recommended approach for assessing DILI severity [40]. However, numerous novel liver-related biomarkers have emerged, such as cytokeratin-18, macrophage colonystimulating factor receptor 1, and osteopontin [41][42][43]. The main disadvantage of these biomarkers, in contrast to miR-122, is that they are not liver-specific, and their fluctuations during ASCT may reflect the total impact of chemotherapy responses elicited on all tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ALT use in 2009 for evaluating drug-induced liver toxicity (DILI), and it remains integral to the FDA-recommended approach for assessing DILI severity [40]. However, numerous novel liver-related biomarkers have emerged, such as cytokeratin-18, macrophage colonystimulating factor receptor 1, and osteopontin [41][42][43]. The main disadvantage of these biomarkers, in contrast to miR-122, is that they are not liver-specific, and their fluctuations during ASCT may reflect the total impact of chemotherapy responses elicited on all tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%