2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Calibrated Short TR Recovery (CaSTRR) Method for Brain-Blood Partition Coefficient Correction Enhances Gray-White Matter Contrast in Blood Flow Measurements in Mice

Abstract: The goal of the study was to develop a novel, rapid Calibrated Short TR Recovery (CaSTRR) method to measure the brain-blood partition coefficient (BBPC) in mice. The BBPC is necessary for quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) using tracer-based techniques like arterial spin labeling (ASL), but previous techniques required prohibitively long acquisition times so a constant BBPC equal to 0.9 mL/g is typically used regardless of studied species, condition, or disease. An accelerated method of BBPC correction coul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we were able to produce BBPC maps of sufficient quality to perform voxel-wise correction of CBF maps with coverage of the entire brain using a CaSTRR acquisition protocol that only required 4 min of scan time. This is an improvement over the reported CaSTRR technique in mice which required 17 min of scan time due to the much higher resolution requirement of scanning small animals at 7T (Thalman et al, 2019). A 4 min scan time is comparable to the acquisition time of the pCASL technique for CBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study we were able to produce BBPC maps of sufficient quality to perform voxel-wise correction of CBF maps with coverage of the entire brain using a CaSTRR acquisition protocol that only required 4 min of scan time. This is an improvement over the reported CaSTRR technique in mice which required 17 min of scan time due to the much higher resolution requirement of scanning small animals at 7T (Thalman et al, 2019). A 4 min scan time is comparable to the acquisition time of the pCASL technique for CBF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another significant advantage of this study is the use of Bayesian bias field correction to account for inhomogeneities in the receiver coil sensitivity profile. The CaSTRR method described in mice assumed a sufficiently homogenous profile in the birdcage receive coil, but observed significant signal loss near the large ear canals of the mouse (Thalman et al, 2019). Other BBPC studies attempted to correct for bias field using a separate measurement on a uniform phantom (Roberts et al, 1996; Leithner et al, 2010), but it is unlikely that the receiver profile would be the same when measuring the non-uniform tissue of a live subject.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations