2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2010.543487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel compensation-based non-fragileHcontrol for uncertain neutral systems with time-varying delays

Abstract: This article studies the non-fragile H 1 control problem for a class of uncertain linear neutral systems with time-varying delays, where the delay in neutral-type term includes a fast-varying case (i.e. the derivative of delay is more than one), which is seldom considered in current literature. The less conservative delay-dependent H 1 control results for this systems are proposed by applying a new Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional and a geometric series compensation method. Based on the new functional, the syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al 502 Gao et al 2008;Zhang, Li, Yang, and Yang 2009a;Fridman 2010;Luan, Shi, and Liu 2011;Quang, Holic, and Vesely 2011;Yang et al 2011b;Liu et al 2012), free weighting matrices are introduced in order to reduce the conservation and bring the flexibility to solving the resulting LMIs. However, too many free weighting matrices employed in the existing methods may complicate the system analysis and increase the computational demand to some degree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al 502 Gao et al 2008;Zhang, Li, Yang, and Yang 2009a;Fridman 2010;Luan, Shi, and Liu 2011;Quang, Holic, and Vesely 2011;Yang et al 2011b;Liu et al 2012), free weighting matrices are introduced in order to reduce the conservation and bring the flexibility to solving the resulting LMIs. However, too many free weighting matrices employed in the existing methods may complicate the system analysis and increase the computational demand to some degree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 1: Consider system (1) with the state feedback controller (3) and the parameters abridged from Lien and Yu (2007) (see also Liu et al 2012) are listed as follows…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of convenience here, we only consider the case of f 1 and f 2 with zero-and first-order terms in this paper (i.e., only let ρ = 1 and 2), which are similar with the methods in [30,31]. Meanwhile, we have proposed a method to handle the case with the infinite high-order terms (ρ > 2) in [32,33], which can achieve the aim of further reducing conservatism.…”
Section: Static Output Feedback Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, the controller should be able to tolerate some uncertainty in its coefficients due to the fact that the uncertainty is not avoided, which is caused by many reasons, such as finite word length in digital systems, the imprecision inherent in analog systems, and the need for additional tuning of parameters in the final controller implementation . Recently, there have been some new progresses to cope with the non‐fragile controller design problem , but a non‐fragile controller with randomly occurring controller gain fluctuation (ROCGF) has not yet received adequate research attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%