2015
DOI: 10.2135/cssaspecpub26.c8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Endophyte Technology: Selection of the Fungus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plants P27CTE+ and P46CTE+ were derived from locally obtained KY31 seeds harboring E. coenophiala strain CTE‐1 (Young et al, 2014). Two plants with NTE strains were obtained by inoculation of tall fescue cultivar KY31 E− seedlings with different fungal strains from L. arundinaceum plants collected in Morocco (West et al, 1998), one of which was a strain (designated NTE‐19) of E. coenophiala , and the other was a strain (designated FaTG4‐16) of the E. typhina × Epichloë sp. hybrid species FaTG‐4 (Takach and Young, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants P27CTE+ and P46CTE+ were derived from locally obtained KY31 seeds harboring E. coenophiala strain CTE‐1 (Young et al, 2014). Two plants with NTE strains were obtained by inoculation of tall fescue cultivar KY31 E− seedlings with different fungal strains from L. arundinaceum plants collected in Morocco (West et al, 1998), one of which was a strain (designated NTE‐19) of E. coenophiala , and the other was a strain (designated FaTG4‐16) of the E. typhina × Epichloë sp. hybrid species FaTG‐4 (Takach and Young, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%