2021
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2021.1892209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The algorithm works as follows: (i) At the first step, it adds randomness to the dataframe by shuffling each feature which are called shadow feature (ii) Then, it trains the RF classifier to measure the Z score values and checks whether the attribute has a higher Z score than the maximum Z score among shadow attributes (MZSA). (iii) Finally, the features having value less than MZSA are rejected for being irrelevant and vice versa (Kursa and Rudnicki, 2010;Amiri et al, 2019;Prasad et al, 2021). Shadow minimum, mean, and maximum values represent the Z score of a shadow attribute.…”
Section: Boruta and Multicollinearity Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The algorithm works as follows: (i) At the first step, it adds randomness to the dataframe by shuffling each feature which are called shadow feature (ii) Then, it trains the RF classifier to measure the Z score values and checks whether the attribute has a higher Z score than the maximum Z score among shadow attributes (MZSA). (iii) Finally, the features having value less than MZSA are rejected for being irrelevant and vice versa (Kursa and Rudnicki, 2010;Amiri et al, 2019;Prasad et al, 2021). Shadow minimum, mean, and maximum values represent the Z score of a shadow attribute.…”
Section: Boruta and Multicollinearity Feature Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training dataset defines the model fitness whereas the testing dataset represents the predictive capability of the model (Bui et al, 2018;Prasad et al, 2021). In the case of training dataset, among the six models, the RF performed excellently with the highest value of 1 quantified by accuracy, Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in both the primary and secondary study area (Table 4).…”
Section: Performance and Comparison Of The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NDVI is a good indicator of vegetation coverage, largely inducing soil moisture, evapotranspiration, infiltration, sediment transportation, and runoff. High NDVI minimizes flood events [28] and vice versa. The NDVI layer was prepared from the Sentinel 2B MSI image of 2021 using the NDVI estimation equation (Equation ( 7)).…”
Section: Terrain Distribution Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sachdeva and Kumar [27] employed an ensemble ML approach of an extremely randomized tree model for FHZ mapping with 14 flood conditioning factors for lower Assam, India, in the year 2020. Prasad et al [28] used ensemble ML techniques based on adabag classifiers and AUC with 12 flood-inducing factors for FHZ mapping on the central west coast of India. Novel integration of bootstrapping and random subsampling techniques had high precision for FHZ mapping in Ardabil province, Iran [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these models require detailed data at locationsuch as hydro-geomorphological datarequiring intensive calculations and thus making short-term forecasting difficult (Eslaminezhad et al 2022). Previous research has demonstrated that physics-based models only have short-term predictive ability (Eslaminezhad et al 2022;Prasad et al 2022). One final challenge is that the establishment of these models requires a thorough understanding of hydrological parameters (Pham et al 2021f).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%