1993
DOI: 10.1039/dt9930000127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel hexanuclear ruthenium clusters with unusual metal framework geometries: ‘boat’ and ‘sofa’ configurations of the Ru6core

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of 5 from thermolysis reactions of 1 in the presence of PPh 3 has interesting implications. The thermolysis of 1 in the absence of PPh 3 leads to an entirely different group of products …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of 5 from thermolysis reactions of 1 in the presence of PPh 3 has interesting implications. The thermolysis of 1 in the absence of PPh 3 leads to an entirely different group of products …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'assemblage conceptionnel de structures superieures a partir de structures de nuclkarite inferieure est encore assez limit(.. Adurns et collaborateurs ont dkmontri: l'utilitt de la presence de ligands auxiliaires ayant la capacitt: de ponter plusieurs atomes mktalliques, pour de telles reactions [l-51. Recemment nous avons publie la synthese de clusters hexanucliaires contenant une ossature mktallique en forme de bateau ou de divan, par condensation de deux unites trinucleaires [6]. Dans le present travail nous decrivons l'assemblage de clusters tetranucleaires a ossature planaire, a partir de deux unites dinucleaires.…”
unclassified
“…The Ru-Ru bond distances within the basal plane span a wide range [2.787(2)−3.027(2) Å] with an apical Ru atom capped asymmetrically such that only two Ru(basal)−Ru(apex) bonds [Ru(3)−Ru(5) 2.787(1) Å and Ru(2)−Ru(5) 2.812(2) Å] are formed while the opposite edges [Ru(1)···Ru(5) 3.243(2) Å and Ru(4)···Ru(5) 3.181(2) Å] are significantly longer than the Ru−Ru metal bond found in [Ru 3 (CO) 12 ], indicating that there is no significant metal−metal bond between them. It is interesting to note that thermolysis of a related sulfur containing ruthenium cluster, [Ru 3 (CO) 9 (μ-H)(μ 3 -η 2 -PhNCSNHPh)] gives a μ 5 -sulfido complex [Ru 6 (CO) 16 (μ-H)(μ 5 -S)(μ 3 -η 2 -PhNCSNHPh)] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%