2023
DOI: 10.1002/pat.6178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel high‐strength polyester composite scaffolds for bone regeneration

Sara Katebifar,
Michael Arul,
Sama Abdulmalik
et al.

Abstract: Repair of critical‐sized bone defects, particularly in load‐bearing areas, is a major clinical problem that requires surgical intervention and implantation of biological or engineered grafts. For load‐bearing sites, it is essential to use engineered grafts that have both sufficient mechanical strength and appropriate pore properties to support bone repair and tissue regeneration. Unfortunately, the mechanical properties of such grafts are often compromised due to the creation of pores required to facilitate ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They must be: (i) nontoxic to host tissues (i.e., biocompatible), (ii) able to degrade their structure to give space for the growing bone cells (i.e., biodegradable) [34], (iii) able to permit the cells to stick and multiply on their surfaces to generate extracellular matrix (i.e., osteoconductive) [35], (iv) able to induce neo-bone tissues through mechanical stimulus (i.e., osteoinductive) [36], (v) able to form bone materials with the help of bone-forming cells 'osteoblasts' (i.e., osteogenic), (vi) able to integrate existing osseous tissues with their load-bearing surfaces (osteointegration) [37], (vii) exhibit appropriate morphological characteristics like pore size, porosity, and pore connectivity [38], and (viii) mirror the mechanical properties of the host tissues, including Young's modulus and compressive strength. These properties of scaffolds are influenced by their materials, such as synthetic and natural polymers, bio-composites, metal alloys and ceramics (Figures 3 and 4) [39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They must be: (i) nontoxic to host tissues (i.e., biocompatible), (ii) able to degrade their structure to give space for the growing bone cells (i.e., biodegradable) [34], (iii) able to permit the cells to stick and multiply on their surfaces to generate extracellular matrix (i.e., osteoconductive) [35], (iv) able to induce neo-bone tissues through mechanical stimulus (i.e., osteoinductive) [36], (v) able to form bone materials with the help of bone-forming cells 'osteoblasts' (i.e., osteogenic), (vi) able to integrate existing osseous tissues with their load-bearing surfaces (osteointegration) [37], (vii) exhibit appropriate morphological characteristics like pore size, porosity, and pore connectivity [38], and (viii) mirror the mechanical properties of the host tissues, including Young's modulus and compressive strength. These properties of scaffolds are influenced by their materials, such as synthetic and natural polymers, bio-composites, metal alloys and ceramics (Figures 3 and 4) [39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20–22 The FDA has also approved PLA and PCL as implantable degradable polymer materials. 23 The PLA electrospun membrane is deformation-resistant and has acceptable stiffness; however, it lacks hydrophilicity and toughness. 24 Despite having good toughness, the PCL electrospun membrane has a low elastic modulus and yield strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%