2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02411-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel insights into wound age estimation: combined with “up, no change, or down” system and cosine similarity in python environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several preliminary studies of wound age estimation, multibiomarker analysis was suggested to improve wound age estimation sensitivity and specificity [ 1 , 22 , 29 , 30 ]. In the previous studies, multibiomarker analysis was used at morphological level according to the presence or absence of biomarkers [ 9 , 10 ], or at the genetic level according to several biomarkers level changes, such as “up, no change, and down”, to estimate the wound age [ 22 , 30 ]. However, the above data analysis approach forcibly transforms continuous variables into discrete variables, resulting in the loss of valuable information from biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several preliminary studies of wound age estimation, multibiomarker analysis was suggested to improve wound age estimation sensitivity and specificity [ 1 , 22 , 29 , 30 ]. In the previous studies, multibiomarker analysis was used at morphological level according to the presence or absence of biomarkers [ 9 , 10 ], or at the genetic level according to several biomarkers level changes, such as “up, no change, and down”, to estimate the wound age [ 22 , 30 ]. However, the above data analysis approach forcibly transforms continuous variables into discrete variables, resulting in the loss of valuable information from biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Fisher discriminant analysis showed the groups with the highest accuracy at different grouping levels were ARE– group (91.0%), CC group (78.2%), and ARE–CC subgroup (66.7%), respectively ( Table 3 ). In this study, the injury time was strictly determined based on experimental design, and there was no merging of damage time points or stratified discrimination to improve accuracy [ 35 ]. The results showed that using the selected indices to determine the injury time ensures the sensitivity of prediction, simplifies the process of inference, and thus accuracy is improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RT-qPCR was performed in a 25 µL reaction system using the Premix Ex Taq Kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) [29]. The contents of the amplification mix and the thermal cycling conditions were set according to the instructions.…”
Section: Relative Quantitative Protocol Of Nine Mrnas' Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%