Two functional, flexible ligands, namely 3,6‐dipyrazolyl‐9‐ethylcarbazole (L1) and 3,6‐diimidazolyl‐9‐ethylcarbazole (L2) have been synthesized and characterized and their coordination to various AgI, CdII, and CoII salts investigated. Six new complexes, 1–6, have been obtained and fully characterized by IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The 2D double helix framework of the complex [CdL1I2]n (1) is formed by C–H···I hydrogen bonds, whereas the same 2D double helix framework of compound [{AgL1SO3PhCH3}2(CH3OH)(H2O)]n (2) is formed by S–O···H and C–H···O hydrogen bonds and weak π–π interactions. The coordination modes of CdII and CoII in [CdL22(NCS)2]n (3), [CoL22(NCS)2(CHCl3)2]n (4), [CdL22(NO3)2(CH3OH)2]n (5), and [CoL22(NO3)2(CH3OH)2]n (6) are the same, but in the packing diagram interlayers form a 3D network through C–H···S interactions and π–π interactions in 3, interlayers form a 3D network through S···S interactions and π–π interactions in 4, novel 3D structures are formed by interchain O···H–C hydrogen bonding and interlayer O···H–C hydrogen‐bonding and π–π interactions in 5 and 6. The structural differences between these complexes show the influence of the orientation of the coordinating group of the ligand. These results also show that the metal ion, anion, and nonbonding and π–π interactions are significant factors in controlling the structural topology of these metal‐organic supramolecular architectures. In addition, the luminescence properties of L1, 1, L2, and 3 are investigated in the solid state at room temperature. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2007)