2017
DOI: 10.1080/01650521.2016.1273751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel long-distance movements by Neotropical bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) evidenced by recaptures in southeastern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rarefaction/extrapolation for q = 0 clearly shows a progressive decline in richness along the elevational gradient (see Supporting Information Appendix S2), despite the convergence to a similar level of richness in the three lowest bands as the sample size increases. This is probably due to an infrequent presence in elevated areas of species that are mostly present at low elevation; the small distances that separate low and high elevation in these mountain ranges can be easily covered by bats for long‐distance dispersal (Esbérard, Godoy, Renovato, & Carvalho, ) or on foraging trips (Mello et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rarefaction/extrapolation for q = 0 clearly shows a progressive decline in richness along the elevational gradient (see Supporting Information Appendix S2), despite the convergence to a similar level of richness in the three lowest bands as the sample size increases. This is probably due to an infrequent presence in elevated areas of species that are mostly present at low elevation; the small distances that separate low and high elevation in these mountain ranges can be easily covered by bats for long‐distance dispersal (Esbérard, Godoy, Renovato, & Carvalho, ) or on foraging trips (Mello et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies show the opposite effect in non-flying mammals, bats, birds, and trees (Galindo-González & Sosa 2003;Cleary et al 2016;Socolar et al 2019;Pardo et al 2019) . The lack of a significant effect of distance to conserved habitats on bat abundance in disturbed habitats may be related to the variation in habitat disturbance type in our study and the ability of phyllostomids to fly large distances either to migrate or forage (Arnone et al 2016;Esbérard et al 2017;Medellin et al 2018) . In order to determine the effect of these two variables on bat abundance in disturbed habitats, studies that evaluate the effects of habitat disturbance on bat abundance comparing disturbance type and phyllsotomid vagility are necessary.…”
Section: Distance To Conserved Forestsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Indeed, bats exhibit frequent mid‐ to long‐distance dispersal events that integrate different communities, especially in the highly fragmented Atlantic Forest (Arnone, Trajano, Pulcherio‐Leite, & Passos, 2016; Bianconi, Mikich, & Pedro, 2006; Mendes, Vieira, Oprea, & Ditchfield, 2009). For example, Artibeus lituratus , Sturnira lilium and Platyrrhinus lineatus have been recorded to move 85, 79 and 120 km, respectively, between communities (Esberard et al., 2017). These are some of the most numerous bats in the Atlantic Forest, suggesting that such integrative movements are common.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dispersal distances for such free‐ranging and mobile organisms are difficult to capture and thus such findings are rare and certainly dispersal distances are underestimated. Nonetheless, Neotropical bats have been reported to disperse at least hundreds of kilometres (Esberard, Godoy, Renovato, & Carvalho, 2017). Neotropical bats exhibit extensive, hemispheric gradients in biodiversity characterized not only by species richness (Willig & Lyons, 1998; Willig & Selcer, 1989) but also functional (Stevens, Cox, Strauss, & Willig, 2003), trait (Stevens, Willig, & Strauss, 2006) and phylogenetic (Stevens, Tello, & Gavilanez, 2013) dimensions of biodiversity as well as patterns of taxonomic (Villalobos & Arita, 2010) and phylogenetic diversity fields (Villalobos, Rangel, & Diniz‐Filho, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%