2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Machine Learning Can Predict Acute Asthma Exacerbation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing models for predicting an individual asthma or COPD patient's health outcomes typically have low accuracy . The systematic review by Loymans et al [52] and our review [43] showed that for forecasting hospital use (emergency department visits and inpatient stays) for asthma in patients with asthma, each previous model, excluding the models of Zein et al [58], has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) within 0.61-0.81, a sensitivity within 25%-49%, and a positive predictive value within 4%-22% [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. The models of Zein et al [58] and our recent new models [43][44][45] have similarly higher accuracy but are still not good enough for aligning preventive care with the patients needing it the most.…”
Section: Gap 1: Low Prediction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Existing models for predicting an individual asthma or COPD patient's health outcomes typically have low accuracy . The systematic review by Loymans et al [52] and our review [43] showed that for forecasting hospital use (emergency department visits and inpatient stays) for asthma in patients with asthma, each previous model, excluding the models of Zein et al [58], has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) within 0.61-0.81, a sensitivity within 25%-49%, and a positive predictive value within 4%-22% [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. The models of Zein et al [58] and our recent new models [43][44][45] have similarly higher accuracy but are still not good enough for aligning preventive care with the patients needing it the most.…”
Section: Gap 1: Low Prediction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, it also allows missing values for prediction, which is more advantageous than the conventional logistic regression model. For example, the previous study demonstrated the usefulness of light GBM to build an accurate risk prediction for asthma exacerbation with possessing the advantage of identifying missing values as a unique entity 22 . Importantly, our study is unique in that we created the calculator on the website to assist interventional cardiologists in identifying high-risk patients for AKI after PCI, highlighting the importance of implementing the risk model in physicians.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we constructed the SHAP approach to select the important variables with the light GBM using the 12 NCDR variables. This approach explains the models at the level of individual patients based on the sum of the numeric computed credit (SHAP) values of each feature 22 , 23 . Categorical variables (age, eGFR, and preprocedural hemoglobin) were entered as continuous variables in the Lasso and SHAP models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations