2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.98.044022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel matter coupling in general relativity via canonical transformation

Abstract: We study canonical transformations of general relativity (GR) to provide a novel matter coupling to gravity. Although the transformed theory is equivalent to GR in vacuum, the equivalence no longer holds if a matter field minimally couples to the canonically transformed gravitational field. We find that a naive matter coupling to the transformed field leads to the appearance of an extra mode in the phase space, rendering the theory inconsistent. We then find a consistent and novel way of matter coupling: after… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have quickly studied cosmological solutions for a generic choice of function f (x), but it would be interesting to make a systematic analysis of cosmological perturbations and of the constraints that observations put on these theories if they account for dark energy. For that, it is important to first understand in details how to consistently couple matter in these theories following the analysis of [25,27]. This would also allow us to study, for instance, the structure of stars in these theories and to see how Newton laws are modified in this framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have quickly studied cosmological solutions for a generic choice of function f (x), but it would be interesting to make a systematic analysis of cosmological perturbations and of the constraints that observations put on these theories if they account for dark energy. For that, it is important to first understand in details how to consistently couple matter in these theories following the analysis of [25,27]. This would also allow us to study, for instance, the structure of stars in these theories and to see how Newton laws are modified in this framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of matter, these equations have to be supplemented with source terms. However, describing explicitly how matter is coupled to the (modified) gravitational field is subtle and has been analyzed in great details in [25,27]. A "naive" minimal coupling 3 of the matter fields, for 3 If the matter is minimally coupled (with no derivative couplings) and is described by a action SM associated to an energy-momentum tensor T µν , then the equation for hij (3.29) is unchanged, the deformed Hamiltonian constraint becomes f (Hgr) + 16πGN N 2 T 00 ≈ 0 , (3.32) and the equation for the momenta πij contains a source terṁ…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 There could be a first class constraint in Φ I ≈ 0, Ψ i ≈ 0 or a tertiary constraint from d dt Ψ ≈ 0 depending on the Lagrangian which give further reductions of the number of degrees of freedom. The resultant theory would be a class of the minimally modified gravity theories [49,75] or the cuscuton theories [76][77][78]. However, we do not discuss whether such additional reductions exist and only focus on the fact the the Lagrangian is free from the Ostrogradsky ghost.…”
Section: Counting the Number Of Degrees Of Freedommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in [2], the same prescription can be applied also to the examples of MMG in [1]: one can simply add matter fields after gauge-fixing. Ref.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ref. [2] then found a consistent way of matter coupling: after a canonical transformation, one needs to impose a gauge-fixing condition as an additional constraint before adding matter fields. In this way, the first-class constraint associated with the time diffeomorphism invariance is split into a pair of second-class constraints and the pair remains second-class after the addition of matter fields.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%