2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel methodology for assessing biomaterial–biofluid interaction in cancellous bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Jasper et al suggested that a higher modulus may translate to better mechanical stabilization, resulting in a lower use of Orthocomp™ compared to PMMA cement [55]. Similarly, for compressive yield strength and ultimate compressive strength, PMMA cements ranged from 50 ± 73 MPa and from 53 ± 80 MPa, respectively, but Orthocomp™ exhibited strength values 2–3 times those values [64]. …”
Section: Alternatives To Pmmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Jasper et al suggested that a higher modulus may translate to better mechanical stabilization, resulting in a lower use of Orthocomp™ compared to PMMA cement [55]. Similarly, for compressive yield strength and ultimate compressive strength, PMMA cements ranged from 50 ± 73 MPa and from 53 ± 80 MPa, respectively, but Orthocomp™ exhibited strength values 2–3 times those values [64]. …”
Section: Alternatives To Pmmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Jasper et al suggested higher modulus may translate to better mechanical stabilization resulting in less use of Orthocomp ™ compared to PMMA cement [55]. Similarly, for compressive yield strength and ultimate compressive strength, PMMA cements ranged from 50 ± 73 MPa and from 53 ± 80 MPa, respectively, but Orthocomp ™ exhibited strength values 2-3 times those values [64].…”
Section: Orthocomp ™ and Hydroxyapatitementioning
confidence: 99%