2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-06988-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel monitoring method for material removal rate considering quantitative wear of abrasive belts based on LightGBM learning algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiong [12] et al used the XGBoost model to predict the cement specific surface area , and their results had smaller errors compared to GBM and RF. Wang [13] et al used the LightGBM model to predict the wear of sand belt, and their results showed that LightGBM not only excelled in prediction accuracy, but also its computational speed was relatively fast. Although the traditional machine learning approach is widely used in data-driven prediction models, it is only applicable to small sample data modeling and performs well in semi-supervised learning to effectively fill in missing data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiong [12] et al used the XGBoost model to predict the cement specific surface area , and their results had smaller errors compared to GBM and RF. Wang [13] et al used the LightGBM model to predict the wear of sand belt, and their results showed that LightGBM not only excelled in prediction accuracy, but also its computational speed was relatively fast. Although the traditional machine learning approach is widely used in data-driven prediction models, it is only applicable to small sample data modeling and performs well in semi-supervised learning to effectively fill in missing data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al [ 19 ] studied spark images generated during the abrasive belt blasting process, extracted characteristics including spark image area and illumination, and studied the relationship between spark field characteristics and the material removal rate. Wang Nina et al [ 20 , 21 ] studied the characteristics of sound and spark images during the abrasive belt grinding process, fused the signals of images and sound, and established a material removal rate model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm used is another key factor affecting the accuracy of MRR prediction. With the development of computer science and technology, various machine learning regression algorithms have been proposed and used in MRR prediction, including SVM [15], CNN [22], XGBoost [20], LightGBM [23], categorical boosting (CatBoost), etc. In the gradient boosting algorithm family, XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost are the most popular and effective algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%