2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29913-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel multifunctional RKKY coupling layer for ultrathin perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnet

Abstract: A novel multi-functional antiferromagnetic coupling layer (MF-AFC) combining Ru and W is revealed to realize an extremely thin (3.8 nm), back-end-of-line compatible as well as magnetically and electrically stable perpendicular synthetic antiferromagnetic layer (pSAF), essential for spintronic memory and logic device applications. In addition to achieving antiferromagnetic RKKY coupling, this MF-AFC also acts as a Boron sink and texture-breaking layer. A detailed optimization of the thickness of the various inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By taking B dep as a measure of the coupling magnitude, if the coupling were RKKY mediated, it should be on the order of a few Oersteds, corresponding to J ∼ 0.4×10 −3 erg/cm 2 (assuming an exchange field of H RKKY = 3 Oe, M s = 1100 emu/cm 3 , and t Ti = 2 nm). A RKKY effect of such a magnitude is about three orders of magnitude smaller than reported for the standard Co/Ru/Co multilayers [58]. Therefore, the origin of the asymmetry in the DW depinning and expansion is ascribed to a magnetostatic orange peel effect [scenario (i)], although minor contributions from the RKKY coupling cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Different Coupling Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…By taking B dep as a measure of the coupling magnitude, if the coupling were RKKY mediated, it should be on the order of a few Oersteds, corresponding to J ∼ 0.4×10 −3 erg/cm 2 (assuming an exchange field of H RKKY = 3 Oe, M s = 1100 emu/cm 3 , and t Ti = 2 nm). A RKKY effect of such a magnitude is about three orders of magnitude smaller than reported for the standard Co/Ru/Co multilayers [58]. Therefore, the origin of the asymmetry in the DW depinning and expansion is ascribed to a magnetostatic orange peel effect [scenario (i)], although minor contributions from the RKKY coupling cannot be excluded.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Different Coupling Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, a three‐step reversal process is observed due to larger RKKY exchange bias. [ 19 ] The magnetization of the CoGd (M s‐CoGd ) derived from the M(H) loop is 106 emu cm −3 . Therefore, the RKKY coupling energies (E ex = H ex M s‐CoGd t CoGd ) are calculated to be 0.123 and 0.01 erg cm −2 respectively for 2.5 and 3 nm Pt spacers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study the impact of the FL saturation field on GMR transfer curves, using superconducting quantum interference devicevibrating sample magnetometry (SQUID-VSM), polar magneto-optic Kerr effect (MOKE), and GMR measurement setups. The high H ex in the reference system and the FL saturation field control are achieved by using Co/Pt multilayer (ML) systems [22,[24][25][26][27], where PMA stems from strong spin-orbit coupling and d -d orbital hybridization at the interface [24,28,29]. The behavior in magnetization reversal and magnetoresistance are further investigated through micromagnetic simulations, focusing on switching fields and spin-canting effects [30,31] within the p-SAF reference system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%