2017
DOI: 10.1111/cge.13021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel non‐contiguous exon duplication in choroideremia

Abstract: The importance of establishing a genetic diagnosis in patients with a choroideremia phenotype has been underscored by the advent of gene replacement therapy for this condition. Here, we describe a complex imbalance at the CHM locus in a male patient with classical disease. At the DNA level, this imbalance consists of 2 non‐contiguous duplications (exons 1‐2 and 9‐12). Further characterization suggests the generation of 2 independent CHM transcriptional units, one of which may produce a deleted form of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fibroblasts grown from a skin biopsy cultured in vitro constitute an alternative source of cells obtained by minimally invasive methods. Immunoblot analysis of REP1 expression in cells from choroideremia patients, either PMBCs and/or fibroblasts, has been used to validate the diagnosis of choroideremia, regardless the mutation [13][14][15]18,19,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. All these reports showed absence of REP1 expression in the cell type analysed, except for the three missense mutations, which showed reduced expression of REP1 [13][14][15], and an in-frame deletion (c.117_314del; R40_S105del), where a truncated protein would be predicted.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibroblasts grown from a skin biopsy cultured in vitro constitute an alternative source of cells obtained by minimally invasive methods. Immunoblot analysis of REP1 expression in cells from choroideremia patients, either PMBCs and/or fibroblasts, has been used to validate the diagnosis of choroideremia, regardless the mutation [13][14][15]18,19,55,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. All these reports showed absence of REP1 expression in the cell type analysed, except for the three missense mutations, which showed reduced expression of REP1 [13][14][15], and an in-frame deletion (c.117_314del; R40_S105del), where a truncated protein would be predicted.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 A variety of mutations have been implicated including deletions, insertions, duplications, translocations, nonsense, splice site, frameshift, missense and deep intronic variants. 1,[18][19][20] Most of the mutations in the CHM gene are null, either through deletions (25-50%) or nonsense mutations (30%). 1 Deletions may involve either a few kilobases or the entire length of the gene resulting in a dysfunctional or completely absent protein, while nonsense mutations introduce premature stop codons in the coding sequence signalling abrupt disruption of the translational process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This patient has a pathological noncontiguous duplication in CHM resulting in 2 transcripts: the first comprises exons 1 to 12 without exons 13 to 15 or a termination or polyadenylation signal; the second unit arises from a duplication event and comprises the exons 1 to 2 and exons 9 to 15. 30 The primer set used in this study binds within exon 3, and so detects the expression of the first transcriptional unit. This transcript does not lead to the translation of detectable or functional REP1 protein.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%