2017 IEEE PES PowerAfrica 2017
DOI: 10.1109/powerafrica.2017.7991242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel nonimaging solar concentrator for portable solar systems for developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gain-to-volume ratio of the GOCRSH is compared to the CRSH (A,B,C) [8] and to several nonimgaing concentrators proposed for building integrated concentrated photovoltaics (BICPV) in Table 3 and Fig. 4.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gain-to-volume ratio of the GOCRSH is compared to the CRSH (A,B,C) [8] and to several nonimgaing concentrators proposed for building integrated concentrated photovoltaics (BICPV) in Table 3 and Fig. 4.…”
Section: Optimisation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For usability, a solar concentrator needs to have a sufficiently large acceptance angle (defined at 90% of the maximum power) to enable full battery charge without tracking, have low operation and maintenance costs and have a small volume to maintain portability. A novel nonimaging concentrator design was recently proposed for portable solar systems for developing countries [8] and is here referred to as circular rotational square hyperboloid (CRSH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a review of existing concentrators published in [1] it was concluded that the most suitable concentrator type for portable solar systems for developing countries is the static nonimaging concentrator since no minimal focal distance, tracking or cooling is required and compact designs can therefore be achieved. A comparative table of the nonimaging concentrator designs is presented in Table 1 which includes nonimaging concentrators proposed for building integrated PV (Refractive 3D CCPC [13], SEH [13], RADTIRC [6], RACPC [14], Aspheric lens [15]) as well as the circular rotational square hyperboloid (CRSH) [16] proposed for portable solar systems for developing countries. The concentrators are rated based on their optical properties as well as on their volume and overall concentrator height to find the most compact and efficient nonimaging concentrator.…”
Section: = × (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[96] has a wide acceptance angle and geometrical concentration ratio, its optical efficiency however can be further improved and height further reduced. From the CRSH designs the CRSH_C is the most suitable due to its smallest height and widest acceptance angle, its height, however, can be reduced and acceptance angle further improved [16]. Whilst this design has already shown to be more compact than the nonimaging concentrators for building integration presented in Table 1, its design method does not guarantee maximum compactness.…”
Section: = × (3)mentioning
confidence: 99%