2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel pectin based composite hydrogel derived from grapefruit peel for enhanced Cu(II) removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…of Cu(II) and the contact time were close, the Cu(II) C r for nanotubes were almost 20 to 30 times higher than those for AL-PEI-CS 2 and far beyond the discharged standard of 2 mg/L. Similar phenomenon was also observed for hydrogel prepared by Zhang et al [41] (Fig. 3(b)).…”
Section: Residual Concentration Of Cu(ii) At the Presence Of Cationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…of Cu(II) and the contact time were close, the Cu(II) C r for nanotubes were almost 20 to 30 times higher than those for AL-PEI-CS 2 and far beyond the discharged standard of 2 mg/L. Similar phenomenon was also observed for hydrogel prepared by Zhang et al [41] (Fig. 3(b)).…”
Section: Residual Concentration Of Cu(ii) At the Presence Of Cationssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The experimental data fitted by the pseudo-second-order kinetics model (R 2 = 0.992) was better than the pseudo-first-order kinetics model (R 2 = 0.921) ( Figure S2 and Table S1), suggesting that chemisorption was the leading factor in the uptake of Cu(II) by ASHMA. Meanwhile, the Q e value calculated by pseudo-second-order kinetics is closer to those obtained by the experiment [36].…”
Section: Adsorption Propertiessupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thermodynamic parameters such as standard enthalpy change (∆H ‱ ), entropy change (∆S ‱ ) and Gibbs free energy change (∆G ‱ ) were estimated (Table S2). ∆H ‱ values for ASHMA was 10.991 kJ/mol, the adsorption of Cu(II) was endothermic, which indicated that various binding mechanisms (such as ion exchange and chemical reactions) may be involved in the adsorption process [36,37]. Also, the ∆S ‱ value calculated from the intercept was 89.143 J/(mol·K) for ASHMA.…”
Section: Adsorption Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…PPEA 0.05 had the earliest loss, and the loss was large in the first stage (vaporization of free water) and small in the second stage (vaporization of bound water), while PPEA 0.3 showed the opposite trend to PPEA 0.05 , which may have been because PPEA 0.3 had more fine pores (as observed in Figure 4 ) and better water-holding capacity. The third quick loss stage of 290–360 °C may have been due to the thermal decomposition of PPEAs [ 34 ]. In this degradation range, PPEA 0.3 degraded first, while PPEA 0.05 degraded most seriously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%