The reactions of two types of EFe3‐based acyl clusters [EFe3(CO)9C(O)C(H)CCH2)]− (E = S, 1; Se, 2; Te, 3) with different electrophiles have been systematically studied and compared. When the sulfur‐substituted allylcarbonyl Fe3‐cluster [Fe3(CO)9{μ3‐η2:η1:η3‐C(O)CHC(S)CH2}]− (1) was treated with CH3COCl in CH2Cl2, the Fischer‐type acyloxy carbene cluster [Fe3(CO)9{μ3‐η2:η4:η1‐C(OCOCH3)‐C(H)C(S)CH2}] (4) was obtained, along with the previously reported SC(O)C(CH3)=CH bridged Fe2‐complex [Fe2(CO)6{μ‐η2:η3‐SC(O)C(CH3)CH}] (5) and [HSFe3(CO)9]−. Similar acetylation of the allylcarbonyl SeFe3‐cluster [(μ3‐Se)Fe3(CO)9(μ3‐η1:η1:η3‐C(O)C(H)CCH2)]− (2) produced the Fe2‐carbene complex [Fe2(CO)6{μ‐η2:η3‐C(OCOCH3)C(H)C(Se)CH2}] (6) and the propyne‐bridged SeFe3‐complex [(μ3‐Se)Fe3(CO)9{μ3‐η1:η2:η1‐C(CH3)=C(H)}] (7) as well as [HSeFe3(CO)9]− and [Se2Fe3(CO)9]. However, when the analogous TeFe3‐based allylcarbonyl cluster [(μ3‐Te)Fe3(CO)9(μ3‐η1:η1:η3‐C(O)C(H)CCH2)]− (3) reacted with CH3COCl, only the fragmentation product [Te2Fe3(CO)9] was formed. Further acidification of cluster 1 with HBF4 proceeded to form complex 5 and [HSFe3(CO)9]−. Similar acidification of 2 formed the propyne‐capped complex 7, however, the protonation of 3 led to the formation of [Te2Fe3(CO)9]. Contrast to the reported reactions of 1 and 3, the reaction of 2 with [Cu(CH3CN)4][BF4] formed complex 7 and a new C(O)CH=C(Se)(CH3) bridged Fe2‐complex [Fe2(CO)6{μ‐η2:η3‐C(O)CHC(Se)(CH3)}] (8). The nature and formation of new carbene complexes 4 and 6 were further elucidated with the aid of molecular orbital calculations at the B3PW91 level of density functional theory.