2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel recurrence risk stratification of resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have shown that the prognoses of patients with NF-PanNETs were poorer when compared to patients with functional PanNETs, especially for insulinoma, and were significantly better than patients with poorly differentiated PanNECs. [40][41][42] We found that the percentage of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was lower than in G1/G2 functional PanNETs, although this difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, as the tumor grade increases, the percentage of TLS decreases significantly.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others have shown that the prognoses of patients with NF-PanNETs were poorer when compared to patients with functional PanNETs, especially for insulinoma, and were significantly better than patients with poorly differentiated PanNECs. [40][41][42] We found that the percentage of TLS in G1/G2 NF-PanNETs was lower than in G1/G2 functional PanNETs, although this difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, as the tumor grade increases, the percentage of TLS decreases significantly.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Our institution also generated a recurrent-risk stage system based on independent predictors of recurrence in PanNETs including T stage, N stage, insulinoma and Ki67 index. 41 In contrast to these models, our newly constructed nomogram includes not only clinical characteristics but also immune microenvironment components-TLS, which might help us predict the prognosis of NF-PanNETs more accurately. Overall, our data indicate that our nomogram is as good, if not better than the aforementioned prognostic models of Genc, Ellison, and our own institution.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have established a risk stratification to predict recurrence by combining TNM stage, Ki-67, 10 and functionality. 5 However, the identification of patients with high risk for recurrence remains challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a 5-year survival rate for resected patient is around 90%, recurrence rate is 12-25% at five years and late recurrence were described (up to 70% at 15 years) [117][118][119][120][121]. Follow-up requires a close monitoring with physical examination, biology (essentially for F-pNETS) and cross-sectional imaging (CT/MRI), 3-6 monthly for NF-pNETs and 6-12 monthly for F-pNETs every year for three years, every 1-2 years thereafter, and until 10 years post-pancreatectomy.…”
Section: Recurrence Rate and Follow-up After Resectionmentioning
confidence: 97%