Determining how the hippocampus supports the unique demands of memory encoding and retrieval is fundamental for understanding the biological basis of episodic memory. One possibility proposed by theoretical models is that the distinct computational demands of encoding and retrieval are accommodated by shifts in the functional interaction between the hippocampal CA1 subregion and its input structures. However, empirical tests of this hypothesis are lacking. To test this in humans, we used high-resolution fMRI to measure functional connectivity between hippocampal area CA1 and regions of the medial temporal lobe and midbrain during extended blocks of associative encoding and retrieval tasks. We found evidence for a double dissociation between the pathways supporting successful encoding and retrieval. Specifically, during the associative encoding task, but not the retrieval task, functional connectivity only between area CA1 and the ventral tegmental area predicted associative long-term memory. In contrast, connectivity between area CA1 and DG/CA3 was greater, on average, during the retrieval task compared with the encoding task, and, importantly, the strength of this connectivity significantly correlated with retrieval success. Together, these findings serve as an important first step toward understanding how the demands of fundamental memory processes may be met by changes in the relative strength of connectivity within hippocampal pathways.Key words: CA1; CA3; functional connectivity; high-resolution fMRI; hippocampus; VTA
IntroductionIn everyday experience, memory encoding and retrieval appear seamlessly intertwined; encoding provides material that will later be retrieved, whereas retrieval supplies context to facilitate meaningful encoding. However, the neural mechanisms thought to underlie these processes have been hypothesized to place opposing demands on the episodic memory system (Marr, 1971;O'Reilly and McClelland, 1994). Specifically, the rapid formation of memory traces representing single episodes requires high levels of synaptic plasticity that, during retrieval, could lead to the overwriting of stored memories. Conversely, successful associative retrieval requires that cues reactivate related memory traces and thus benefits from a low threshold for memory reinstatement, but reinstating related memories at the time of encoding could lead to proactive interference (O'Reilly and McClelland, 1994).Although it is generally agreed that the hippocampus is critical for both encoding and retrieval (Scoville and Milner, 1957;Eichenbaum et al., 2007; Squire et al., 2007), it remains unknown how the hippocampus supports the complex demands of both processes. However, the unique pattern of afferent projections converging on area CA1, the major hippocampal output subregion, may provide an answer. On the one hand, inputs to CA1 might differentially support long-term memory encoding. Specifically, both late-phase long-term potentiation (LTP) at CA1 synapses and long-term memory formation have been demonstrated to be...