2018
DOI: 10.1109/lwc.2018.2814576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Sensor Scheduling Scheme for Intruder Tracking in Energy Efficient Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison results of method 2, method 3 and method 4 are shown in Fig.13. Fig.13(a) shows the changes of objective function values in equation (13); Fig.13 (b) shows the changes of radar emission interception probability; Fig.13 (c) shows the changes of target tracking accuracy; Fig.13 (d) shows the changes of target losing probability.…”
Section: Simulation On Multi-target Tracking When Radars Are In Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The comparison results of method 2, method 3 and method 4 are shown in Fig.13. Fig.13(a) shows the changes of objective function values in equation (13); Fig.13 (b) shows the changes of radar emission interception probability; Fig.13 (c) shows the changes of target tracking accuracy; Fig.13 (d) shows the changes of target losing probability.…”
Section: Simulation On Multi-target Tracking When Radars Are In Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can been seen from Fig.13(a) that the objective function values in method 4 keep almost the lowest among the three sensor management methods at most time instants, the sensor management method in the constraint of target losing probability (method 1) performs worse than the sensor management based on information gain (method 4) at most time instants, and the randomly controlling based method (method 3) behaves the worst at most time instants. The reason for this result is that for the objective function, both the target tracking accuracy and radar emission interception probability are added in method 1 as equation (13) shows. However, in method 4, only the target tracking accuracy is taken into consideration and optimized to the greatest extent.…”
Section: Simulation On Multi-target Tracking When Radars Are In Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diddigi et al [18] put forward a reinforcement learning algorithm that tracks intrusions to the tolerance system through upper confidence tree search. With the aid of Markov decision process, the algorithm optimizes the state space and the action space by accurately calculating sensor data, and pinpoints the intrusion nodes in the tolerance system, thereby maintaining the network security at a high speed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%