In this paper, we present a novel multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology for assessing several alternatives under the triangular hesitant fuzzy environment. A scientific evaluation and prioritization approach is proposed by solving the MCDM problems with triangular hesitant fuzzy preference relations (THFPRs). Firstly, the concepts of THFPRs are defined, and a series of aggregation operators is introduced and their corresponding properties are discussed. Then, we define the consistency of the THFPRs and propose two methods to measure consistency. Furthermore, we construct an MCDM model using THFPR (MCDM-THFPR) to help decision makers assess and prioritise alternatives in the decision making process. Lastly, the validity and feasibility of the proposed MCDM-THFPR method for the MCDM are verified by a comparison with two previous approaches, along with certain discussions. (Junhua Hu) Y Yang et al. / Filomat 33:3 (2019), 917-930 918 progress towards estimating missing preferences in decision-making and proposed a group decisionmaking approach using incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations.However, experts express difficulties in real decision-making problems in terms of their preference degrees for one alternative over others using an exact number. Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) is a useful tool for solving this issue, and has been developed extensively [30][31][32]. Xia and Xu [33] extended the fuzzy preference relations (FPRs) to hesitant fuzzy preference relations (HFPRs), in which several possible preference values can be considered a hesitant fuzzy number (HFN). Recently, various types of HFPRs, such as hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations [34], extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations [35]; and hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations [36], are proposed. Aggregation operators, including hesitant-intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging (hesitant-IFWA) operators [36] have also been proposed. Xu and Xia [37] provided distance and similarity measures for HFPRs, and Zhu and Xu [34] suggested consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Many group decisionmaking methods have also been developed using HFPRs [38,39].The PR consistency, which is its important property, is required to ensure that an approach produces consistent results. Multiplicative and additive consistencies of FPRs [27,40], are strict types of consistency. Experts have proposed many definitions of consistency for FPRs and their extensions; for example, Wang and Xu [35] proposed the consistency measures of PRs in extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic environments. Herrera-Viedma et al. [40] presented a new characterization of the consistency property based on the additive transitivity property of the FPRs. Zhu [41] developed methods for measuring consistency in HFPRs; Zhang et al. [42] discussed consistency in probabilistic linguistic preference relation.HFPRs are effective approaches for decision making that assist DMs in describing their preferences whilst a...