2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel super-reduced, pedagogical model for scoping net zero buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it identified the optimal level at which the minimum life cycle energy demand was achieved. On the other hand, Fosas et al [34] presented a simple-to-use model, ZEBRA, aiming to scope zero-carbon buildings in the beginning stage of design. With 33 inputs from the user, the model yields results for both embodied and operational carbon.…”
Section: Analytical and Parametric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it identified the optimal level at which the minimum life cycle energy demand was achieved. On the other hand, Fosas et al [34] presented a simple-to-use model, ZEBRA, aiming to scope zero-carbon buildings in the beginning stage of design. With 33 inputs from the user, the model yields results for both embodied and operational carbon.…”
Section: Analytical and Parametric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Approach 1:) The most common method minimizing building energy demand is to enhance thermal performance of building envelopes or adopting HVAC system with higher energy efficiency [16]. Increasing thermal resistance through insulation [17] [18], enhancing thermal stability through PCM [19], are common and effective means for lowering thermal load of buildings as passive design. And some active technologies [20] such as thermoelectric wall [21], or water flow window [22], are also contributing novel solutions for NZEBs.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a primary pedagogical purpose, this tool needs approximately 33 inputs to generate a reliable building model. Among its drawbacks, the options for energy efficiency measures are limited; for example, implementing phase change materials in the envelope is not available, and energy generation is only calculated by photovoltaic systems [21]. In Mexico, there are two building assessment tools developed in relation to energy performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%