2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.j053034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel Technique to Determine SparkJet Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend is quite different from that of discharge efficiency and heating efficiency of capacitive discharge, where increasing energy deposition will do harm to their improvement [10,14]. Orifice diameter can be used to tailor the instantaneous mass flow rate, and thus the jet duration time.…”
Section: V T T V T a Dt E V T T V T A Dtmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This trend is quite different from that of discharge efficiency and heating efficiency of capacitive discharge, where increasing energy deposition will do harm to their improvement [10,14]. Orifice diameter can be used to tailor the instantaneous mass flow rate, and thus the jet duration time.…”
Section: V T T V T a Dt E V T T V T A Dtmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Jets induced by the capacitive discharge demonstrate higher peak jet velocity but shorter jet duration [26] compared with inductive discharge type. By comparing the experimental pulsed thrust with that obtained from analytical models, heating efficiency of the capacitive discharge has been determined to be less than 10%, and inversely proportional to the amount of energy deposition [27][28][29]. In contrast, nanosecond pulse discharge is reported to have a significantly higher heating efficiency (~60%), and decrease of the rising rate benefits the jet intensity improvement [30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, the drawback of PSJA's low efficiency has been identified, which hinders its practical usage. Various researches pointed out its efficiency is less than 30% [14][15][16][17], sometimes it is even less than 1% [18,19]. It is eventually found that the efficiency is affected by the electrode gap distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%