2002
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.11.12.1795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel therapies for sepsis: antiendotoxin therapies

Abstract: Severe sepsis and septic shock is a common problem encountered in the critical care unit with an estimated incidence in the US of 750,000 cases/year and a mortality rate of 30-50%. Sepsis involves a complex interaction between bacterial factors and the host immune system producing a systemic inflammatory state that may progress to multiple organ failure and death. Endotoxin (a lipopolysaccharide) released from Gram-negative bacteria has been implicated as a potent, prototypical stimulus of the immune response … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternative pharmaceutical therapies targeting single proinflammatory mediators and/or endotoxin are in development, but despite good results in animal models, their effects in humans-as proven by a number of clinical trials-have been so far disappointing (18). Three main such anti-inflammatory strategies aimed at improving the outcome of septic shock have been investigated, based on the administration of glucocorticoids, the development of endotoxin-directed monoclonal antibodies and other agents capable of binding and neutralizing LPS, or the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., anti-TNF antibodies, interleukin-1 receptor antagonists) (35,47,55). Another therapeutic approach with interesting prospects is offered by extracorporeal blood purification, achieved through several distinct techniques (37,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative pharmaceutical therapies targeting single proinflammatory mediators and/or endotoxin are in development, but despite good results in animal models, their effects in humans-as proven by a number of clinical trials-have been so far disappointing (18). Three main such anti-inflammatory strategies aimed at improving the outcome of septic shock have been investigated, based on the administration of glucocorticoids, the development of endotoxin-directed monoclonal antibodies and other agents capable of binding and neutralizing LPS, or the inhibition of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., anti-TNF antibodies, interleukin-1 receptor antagonists) (35,47,55). Another therapeutic approach with interesting prospects is offered by extracorporeal blood purification, achieved through several distinct techniques (37,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one utilized LPS receptor antagonists including anti-CD14 antibodies, anti-LBP antibodies, and lipid A analogs, all of which bind to essential components participating in the signaling mechanism (17,18). The second approach utilized LPS blockers such as anti-lipid A antibodies and modified liposomes, both of which bind to LPS itself and prevent its ability to activate the macrophages (19,20). Note, however, that although these studies have helped us to understand the steps involved in LPS neutralization, the approaches used could not deal with the bacteria from which the LPS is derived (19).…”
Section: Lipopolysaccharide (Lps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lipid A is also known as endotoxin and is the immunomodulatory portion of LPS that triggers the immune system in septic shock. As a consequence, inhibition of lipid A biosynthesis is proposed as a strategy for both the development of novel antibiotics and anti-endotoxins in the treatment of septic shock (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).…”
Section: Lipopolysaccharide (Lps)mentioning
confidence: 99%