2013
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2013.780994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novel thin nanocomposite RO membranes for chlorine resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5, due to the existence of amphiphilic GO and hydrophilic Cs on the modified membrane surface. Several groups reported similar results when using Cs or GO for membrane surface modification [7,32,33,35].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Hydrophilicitysupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5, due to the existence of amphiphilic GO and hydrophilic Cs on the modified membrane surface. Several groups reported similar results when using Cs or GO for membrane surface modification [7,32,33,35].…”
Section: Membrane Surface Hydrophilicitysupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The structuring of GO as a surface modifier leads to a significant membrane enhancement. It was reported that the modified aGO/GO/ sulfonated poly (arylene ether sulfone) (aPES) membrane rejected 98.4% of NaCl with water flux of 28 L/m 2 h, which was greater than the pristine aPES (94.3%) and PA (98%) membranes [33]. A similar technique was applied by Choi et al on a PA TFC membrane, in which the LbL-SA method was utilized to introduce aGO and GO multilayers into the PA (TFC) membrane surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These membranes displayed a high salt exclusion rate (99.9%) and water ux (36.1 kg m À2 h À1 ). Depending on LBL assembled method, Kim et al 120 produced aPES/GO/aminated GO nanocomposite membranes, and authors found that the prepared GO composite membrane shows an excellent salt rejection of 98.4% compared to the pure aPES membrane (94.3%) using a 32 000 ppm NaCl solution in feed side. In this work, Kim and co-workers 120 also found the water ux of the aPES/GO/aGO membrane is relatively low in a reverse osmosis (RO) process because of the existence of nanoparticle and sulfonated poly material.…”
Section: 115mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior finds an explanation if the interaction between the ions in solution and the negative charged surface of the GO membrane is taken into account together with the fact that the membrane is able to block ions and molecules having a hydrated radius larger than the pores and channel dimension. Kim et al [70] tested a Sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) membrane coated with a structure of many GO and aminated GO layers, showing a high salt rejection (above 98%), higher than the membrane without GO (94% salt rejection). This work confirms that the presence of a GO coating on a support membrane can further enhance the filtration properties of the support membrane.…”
Section: Experimental Examples Of Desalination Bymentioning
confidence: 99%