Novel waste heat and oil recovery system in the finishing treatment of the textile process for cleaner production with economic improvement

Abstract

Summary In the textile industry, reactive dyeing requires large volumes of hot water, which increases cost and energy consumption. Although the waste heat of the exhaust gas from the stentering process can be recovered to reduce cost and energy consumption, fiber dust and oil mist inside the exhaust gas cause problems such as fouling and clogged pores. Hence, a novel waste heat and oil recovery system in the finishing treatment of the textile process is proposed for cleaner production with economic improvement. The proposed system comprises the following steps: (a) The exhaust gas is split by the electrostatic precipitator (ESP) at a certain ratio through optimization as its exhaust gas throughput is a key deciding variable for cost and profit. (b) A mathematical model of the overall cost, including profits from oil recovery and energy savings attributed to waste heat recovery, total capital investment, and total product cost attributed to the additional ESP installation, is designed to identify an optimal split ratio. (c) Fiber dust and oil mist are removed from the exhaust gas split at the optimal ratio using the ESP and then recycled as regenerated oil. Waste heat is recovered from the treated gas after the fiber dust and oil mist are recovered as regenerated oil through the heat exchange in the air to water heat exchanger; this recovered heat is supplied to the dyeing process to minimize the energy required for heating the water. (d) Finally, VOCs and the remaining pollutants are removed by activated carbon adsorption from the low‐temperature‐treated gas after the waste heat is recovered. These processes recover waste heat and oil and achieve process stability and efficiency improvements because of the removal of oil mist, fiber dust, and VOCs. As a result, the overall cost can be reduced by 10.2% based on the recovered waste heat and oil, and the fiber dusts, odor, and VOCs are removed by 95%, 89.86%, and 96.28%, respectively.

Multiobjective Optimization of Plastic Waste Sorting and Recycling Processes Considering Economic Profit and CO2 Emissions Using Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II

“…First, the EAC is determined from the total capital investment ( TCI ) and annuity factor ( AF ): where TCI denotes the capital investment, which includes equipment cost, land cost, installation cost, etc. The TCI is determined from the fixed capital investment ( FCI ) , working capital investment ( WCI ), and start-up cost ( SUC ): …”

“…56,57 The TAC is annualized cost, which equally occurs every year during the project lifetime and gives the same net present cost as the actual cash flow sequence. The TAC is calculated from the equivalent annual cost (EAC) and total product cost (TPC): 58,59 = = + TAC EAC TPC total cost (15) First, the EAC is determined from the total capital investment (TCI) and annuity factor (AF): 60 = EAC TCI AF (16) where TCI denotes the capital investment, which includes equipment cost, land cost, installation cost, etc. The TCI is determined from the fixed capital investment (FCI), working capital investment (WCI), and start-up cost (SUC): 61 = + + TCI FCI WCI SUC (17) FCI is the cost that includes building cost, plumbing cost, installation cost of equipment, etc., and it is determined from the total equipment cost of sorting and recycling system: 58 (18) where C equipment is the calculated sum of the equipment cost of the sorting system (EC sorting ), material recycling (EC material ), chemical recycling (EC chemical ), thermal recycling (EC thermal ), and incineration (EC energy recovery ):…”

Advanced Design of Integrated Heat Recovery and Supply System Using Heated Water Storage for Textile Dyeing Process

“…In this method, a large quantity of preheated freshwater is required to induce the reaction between the fibers and the dye. Hence, a large amount of energy is required for heating to meet the process conditions [2]. For the dyeing process, the operating cost of heating the freshwater accounts for 16.2% of the total production cost [3].…”