Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Species of Rhynchospora sect. Tenues are morphologically very similar. Rhynchospora tenuis complex is the most problematic species complex in this group and it concentrates entities of difficult delimitation, as is the case of R. tenuis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis. Samples of these three taxonomic entities, besides R. junciformis and R. breviuscula (Dichromena), were analyzed in a comparative way using morphologic, cytogenetic and molecular tools. Despite of high morphological similarity between these taxa, R. tenuis was separated from R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis according to chromosome numbers (2n = 4 and 2n = 18) and ISSR markers. The combined analysis of shape and size of achenes and stylopodium, number of spikelets, cytogenetic features and molecular markers suggest a clear proximity among Rhynchospora junciformis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis, in relation to R. tenuis. These data indicate the need for a new taxonomic review of R. sect. Tenues, mainly to solve the status and nomenclatural situation of R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis. Key words: cytotaxonomy, dysploidy, ISSR, holocentric chromosomes, Poales. ResumoAs espécies de Rhynchospora sect. Tenues são morfologicamente muito similares. O complexo Rhynchospora tenuis é o mais problemático e concentra entidades de difícil delimitação, como é o caso de R. tenuis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis. Amostras dessas três entidades taxonômicas, além de R. junciformis e R. breviuscula (Dichromena), foram analisadas de modo comparativo usando análises morfológicas, citogenéticas e moleculares. Apesar da elevada similaridade morfológica entre esses taxa, R. tenuis foi separada de R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis de acordo com os números cromossômicos (2n = 4 e 2n = 18) e marcadores ISSR. A análise combinada da forma e tamanho dos aquênios e estilopódio, número de espiguetas, características citogenéticas e de marcadores moleculares, sugere uma clara proximidade entre Rhynchospora junciformis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis, em relação à R. tenuis. Além disso, esses dados indicam a necessidade de uma nova revisão taxonômica para R. sect. Tenues, principalmente para resolver o status e a situação nomenclatural de R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis. Palavras-chave: citotaxonomia, disploidia, ISSR, cromossomos holocêntricos, Poales. Morphological and genomic characterization of Rhynchospora tenuis complex (Cyperaceae) and its taxonomic implicationsCaracterização morfológica e genômica do complexo Rhynchospora tenuis (Cyperaceae) e suas implicações taxômicas
Species of Rhynchospora sect. Tenues are morphologically very similar. Rhynchospora tenuis complex is the most problematic species complex in this group and it concentrates entities of difficult delimitation, as is the case of R. tenuis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis. Samples of these three taxonomic entities, besides R. junciformis and R. breviuscula (Dichromena), were analyzed in a comparative way using morphologic, cytogenetic and molecular tools. Despite of high morphological similarity between these taxa, R. tenuis was separated from R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis according to chromosome numbers (2n = 4 and 2n = 18) and ISSR markers. The combined analysis of shape and size of achenes and stylopodium, number of spikelets, cytogenetic features and molecular markers suggest a clear proximity among Rhynchospora junciformis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis, in relation to R. tenuis. These data indicate the need for a new taxonomic review of R. sect. Tenues, mainly to solve the status and nomenclatural situation of R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis and R. enmanuelis. Key words: cytotaxonomy, dysploidy, ISSR, holocentric chromosomes, Poales. ResumoAs espécies de Rhynchospora sect. Tenues são morfologicamente muito similares. O complexo Rhynchospora tenuis é o mais problemático e concentra entidades de difícil delimitação, como é o caso de R. tenuis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis. Amostras dessas três entidades taxonômicas, além de R. junciformis e R. breviuscula (Dichromena), foram analisadas de modo comparativo usando análises morfológicas, citogenéticas e moleculares. Apesar da elevada similaridade morfológica entre esses taxa, R. tenuis foi separada de R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis de acordo com os números cromossômicos (2n = 4 e 2n = 18) e marcadores ISSR. A análise combinada da forma e tamanho dos aquênios e estilopódio, número de espiguetas, características citogenéticas e de marcadores moleculares, sugere uma clara proximidade entre Rhynchospora junciformis, R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis, em relação à R. tenuis. Além disso, esses dados indicam a necessidade de uma nova revisão taxonômica para R. sect. Tenues, principalmente para resolver o status e a situação nomenclatural de R. tenuis subsp. austro-brasiliensis e R. enmanuelis. Palavras-chave: citotaxonomia, disploidia, ISSR, cromossomos holocêntricos, Poales. Morphological and genomic characterization of Rhynchospora tenuis complex (Cyperaceae) and its taxonomic implicationsCaracterização morfológica e genômica do complexo Rhynchospora tenuis (Cyperaceae) e suas implicações taxômicas
Rhynchospora is one of the most species-rich genera of Cyperaceae and one of the few with entomophilous species. Considering the few anatomical studies of the genus, especially of the reproductive structures, this study comparatively analysed the anatomy of flowers of two representative species of Rhynchospora, R. consanguinea and R. pubera, including the floral vasculature and the anatomy of the style base, which is persistent with the fruit. Both species have congested inflorescences with light-coloured bracts and bisexual flowers, and phenolic idioblasts in the anthers and gynoecium, characteristics that suggest insect pollination. In R. consanguinea, the bisexual and the most proximal male flower has perianths, a new character state reported for the genus. The floral vasculature pattern is similar in both species, but differs from that previously described for Rhynchospora. In both species, there are two vascular bundles in the rachilla, which split into three receptacular bundles, the latter forming a vascular plexus where the bundles of stamens, gynoecium and ovule are connected. No lateral carpellary trace was observed, and the presence of the abaxial receptacular bundle was interpreted as a vestige of the tricarpellate ancestral condition. In the fruit of both species, the thickened style base (stylopodium) has a parenchyma with idioblasts containing phenolic compounds and idioblasts with helical or reticulate cell wall thickenings. The stylopodium is a homologous structure in the species of Rhynchospora and to other genera of Cyperoideae and evolved several times in the subfamily.
A study of the 26 Cyperaceae published in G. Raddi's Agrostografia brasiliensis is presented. Several new synonyms and a re-evaluation of some taxa described by G. Raddi are proposed. The first citation of Fimbristylis pilosa Vahl for Brazil is reported. The new combination, Pleurostachys pilulifera (Bertol.) Longhi-Wagner, Baldini & A. C. Araújo is made.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.