2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty at second glance: a critical appraisal of the novel object paradigm based on meta-analysis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To properly assess the presence of neophobia, responses are compared to those towards familiar food (Greggor et al 2015). To test object neophobia, individuals are confronted with a novel object close to familiar food within a familiar environment and the latency to eat compared to the control without the novel object is recorded (Greggor et al 2015;Takola et al 2021). Testing food and object neophobia within a familiar environment is important, because background familiarity (context) can affect the intensity of a neophobic reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To properly assess the presence of neophobia, responses are compared to those towards familiar food (Greggor et al 2015). To test object neophobia, individuals are confronted with a novel object close to familiar food within a familiar environment and the latency to eat compared to the control without the novel object is recorded (Greggor et al 2015;Takola et al 2021). Testing food and object neophobia within a familiar environment is important, because background familiarity (context) can affect the intensity of a neophobic reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii) tested object neophobia by measuring the time it took lizards to consume food next to an unfamiliar object (De Meester et al 2022). Other studies in lizards focussed on neophilia, the attraction towards novelty (Takola et al 2021). For example, object neophilia was tested in the Italian wall lizard (P. siculus) and the Geniez's wall lizard (P. virescens) to quantify boldness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also reflected in our repeatability analysis which yielded a low repeatability of only 0.12. A meta-analysis looking at repeatability in novel object tests (both neophobia and neophilia) showed an average repeatability of 0.47 (Takola et al, 2021) while another study looking at repeatability in behaviour reports an average of 0.37 (Bell, Hankison, & Laskowski, 2009). Repeatability of responses towards novel objects and novel foods in corvids was calculated around 0.5 (Miller et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii) tested object neophobia by measuring the time it took lizards to consume food next to an unfamiliar object (De Meester et al, 2022). Other studies in lizards focused on neophilia, the attraction towards novelty (Takola et al, 2021). For example, object neophilia was tested in the Italian wall lizard (P. siculus) and the Geniez's wall lizard (P. virescens) to quantify boldness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation