1994
DOI: 10.1049/ip-vis:19941330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty detection and neural network validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 369 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
102
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The variance was determined using the nearest-neighbour method proposed by Bishop [2], in which the average of the squared Euclidean distance to the set of 10 nearest neighbours is determined for each point in ,and is estimated by calculating the average over all points:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variance was determined using the nearest-neighbour method proposed by Bishop [2], in which the average of the squared Euclidean distance to the set of 10 nearest neighbours is determined for each point in ,and is estimated by calculating the average over all points:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to detecting patient deterioration from changes in vital signs is that of novelty detection [2, 20], or one-class classification, which involves the construction of a multivariate, multimodal model of normality using examples of “normal” vital signs. This then allows the classification of test data as either “normal” or “abnormal” with respect to that model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each sample, a check is then made that the probability density of the sample is higher than a lower limit for the density in the training set. This is similar to the novelty detection mechanism in Bishop (1994). If the probability density of the sample is too low, that point is rejected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A novelty detection scheme Bishop, 1994) was used to verify the algorithm applicability range by evaluating the representativeness of the input data in the training dataset (D'Alimonte et al, 2003;Mélin et al, 2011;Sá et al, 2015). The adopted applicability range is based on a novelty index (η) presented in published works (D'Alimonte et al, 2013;Sá et al, 2015).…”
Section: Regional Mlp Nn Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%