2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Novelty Search in Competitive Coevolution

Abstract: Abstract. One of the main motivations for the use of competitive coevolution systems is their ability to capitalise on arms races between competing species to evolve increasingly sophisticated solutions. Such arms races can, however, be hard to sustain, and it has been shown that the competing species often converge prematurely to certain classes of behaviours. In this paper, we investigate if and how novelty search, an evolutionary technique driven by behavioural novelty, can overcome convergence in coevoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of effectiveness contrasts with previous works where PMCNS was successfully used [8,10,11]. Our results suggest that PMCNS's low performance is due to the high degree of deception in most mazes.…”
Section: Combination Of Novelty and Fitnesscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…This lack of effectiveness contrasts with previous works where PMCNS was successfully used [8,10,11]. Our results suggest that PMCNS's low performance is due to the high degree of deception in most mazes.…”
Section: Combination Of Novelty and Fitnesscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Related works such as Gomes' competitive [37] and cooperative [38] evolution papers have a strong adherence to such definitions, but this paper focuses on the evolution of a single predator agent, so the prey agents only loosely follow such definitions. The structure of a simple intelligent agent can be see in Figure 2.7.…”
Section: Embodied Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coevolution. Coevolution can be implemented as competitive [37] or cooperative [38]. As competitive coevolution, the prey would be given the ability to evolve as well.…”
Section: Time-based Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We purposefully are not too stringent in setting our goal -being able to infect a single bacterium (or being infected by a single phage) suffices, and there is no need to be optimal. This is an instance of Minimal Criterion Coevolution [57] where two interacting populations are maintained, with entities only having to meet some minimal functionality criterion to be included. Random variations introduced after each cycle ensures that the population's diversity is maintained while the criterion ensures they remain functional.…”
Section: Realizing Open-endedness For Biological Designmentioning
confidence: 99%