2011
DOI: 10.2979/filmhistory.23.1.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Now is the time (to put on your glasses): 3-D film exhibition in Britain, 1951––55

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is the contention of this article that this alternative narrative is a necessary step to challenge and understand the stories found in those programmes, which presented British 3D as a shambolic, quaint and naive cottage industry subsumed by America and forgotten by history. While that reclamation and revision has begun elsewhere, notably around exhibition (Johnston 2011) and the aesthetics of 3D landscape (Johnston 2015), this article's focus remains on the personal and industrial context of British stereoscopic filmmaking: the men who helped set the 1950s 3D boom rolling, the companies they established, and the films they produced. While these materials are dominated by men, it is not the intention of the article to replace the existing partial narratives with a 'Great Man' theory of history, but to suggest ways in which these historical sources necessarily complicate the linear histories that exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the contention of this article that this alternative narrative is a necessary step to challenge and understand the stories found in those programmes, which presented British 3D as a shambolic, quaint and naive cottage industry subsumed by America and forgotten by history. While that reclamation and revision has begun elsewhere, notably around exhibition (Johnston 2011) and the aesthetics of 3D landscape (Johnston 2015), this article's focus remains on the personal and industrial context of British stereoscopic filmmaking: the men who helped set the 1950s 3D boom rolling, the companies they established, and the films they produced. While these materials are dominated by men, it is not the intention of the article to replace the existing partial narratives with a 'Great Man' theory of history, but to suggest ways in which these historical sources necessarily complicate the linear histories that exist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the second wave of 3D cinema in the 1980s lies outside the scope of this work, and I will refer to it only in passing. It should also be acknowledged that the focus of this dissertation is Hollywood and global Hollywood 3D cinema, and hence 3D cinema productions from outside the US will not be engaged with (for a discussion of 3D cinema in the UK for example, see Johnston 2011Johnston , 2012Johnston , 2015.…”
Section: The Stories Of 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biskind argues that while the creature in Creature from the Black Lagoon can be read as the Other, and thus, following Sontag, equated with the Atom bomb, the film is a "centrist" film which favours technology, as its theme is "nature run amok" (Biskind 1983:107-108). 9 Biskind further finds that the film delivers a warning "not to go poking for utopian alternatives. Home was safe; danger lurked out there [...] the USA circa 1955, was utopian enough for everyone" (Biskind 1983:115).…”
Section: Cinema Reacts To Wwii and 9/11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the second wave of 3D cinema in the 1980s lies outside the scope of this work, and I will refer to it only in passing. It should also be acknowledged that the focus of this dissertation is Hollywood and global Hollywood 3D cinema, and hence 3D cinema productions from outside the US will not be engaged with (for a discussion of 3D cinema in the UK for example, see Johnston 2011Johnston , 2012Johnston , 2015.…”
Section: The Stories Of 3dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biskind argues that while the creature in Creature from the Black Lagoon can be read as the Other, and thus, following Sontag, equated with the Atom bomb, the film is a "centrist" film which favours technology, as its theme is "nature run amok" (Biskind 1983:107-108). 9 Biskind further finds that the film delivers a warning "not to go poking for utopian alternatives. Home was safe; danger lurked out there [...] the USA circa 1955, was utopian enough for everyone" (Biskind 1983:115).…”
Section: Cinema Reacts To Wwii and 9/11mentioning
confidence: 99%