Predictive Modelling for Energy Management and Power Systems Engineering 2021
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817772-3.00009-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nowcasting solar irradiance for effective solar power plants operation and smart grid management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the northern and southern parts of the Lubuskie Voivodeship, the average radiation values are 2.78 kWh/m 2 and 2.76 kWh/m 2 , respectively. The clearness index, expressing the relation of global solar radiation intensity measured at ground level to its equivalent estimated at the top of the atmosphere [63], in both cases, was very similar, and its fluctuations over the year are small. The greatest potential for generating energy from the Sun occurs in the summer (Figure 7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For the northern and southern parts of the Lubuskie Voivodeship, the average radiation values are 2.78 kWh/m 2 and 2.76 kWh/m 2 , respectively. The clearness index, expressing the relation of global solar radiation intensity measured at ground level to its equivalent estimated at the top of the atmosphere [63], in both cases, was very similar, and its fluctuations over the year are small. The greatest potential for generating energy from the Sun occurs in the summer (Figure 7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This model utilizes the previous time step ( t − 1 ) values to predict the one‐step‐ahead ( t + 1 ) values 60 . As the forecast time horizon increases, the accuracy of the model decreases 61 . By Equation (16), a simple persistence model can be defined.…”
Section: Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 As the forecast time horizon increases, the accuracy of the model decreases. 61 By Equation ( 16), a simple persistence model can be defined. It shows that the value of battery capacity ( b C) for future cycle, that is, at 1 step ahead cycle (t + 1) is equal to the capacity (C) observed at the present cycle (t).…”
Section: Persistence Vs Proposed 3 Models For Charging Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when comparison against a reference baseline method is required, there may not be an overall agreement on the details of the implementation of such method and there is still debate regarding this topic, to which works such as [22] attempt to set the details for a standardized method. Additionally, as solar power forecasting has transitioned from the naïve persistence (irradiance I remains constant through forecast window, Equation (2), [23][24][25]) towards the smart persistence as the reference method (clear sky index K t cs remains constant through forecast window, Equation (3), [25,26]), the readers must be aware of which reference was used, making analysis and result comparison more difficult.Î…”
Section: Current State Of the Art In Solar Power Forecasting Performance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce forecast uncertainty due to the clear sky model, especially in cases of marked changes in Linke turbidity during nonclear conditions (as demonstrated in [35]), K t will be used instead of K tcs . As stated in Section 1, persistence forecasting as consensus baseline method has transitioned from naïve persistence (i.e., irradiance remains constant, Equation ( 2)) [23][24][25] towards smart persistence (i.e., clear sky index remains constant, Equation ( 3)) [25,26]. However, the estimation of the clear sky irradiance is subject to astronomical uncertainties (solar geometry modeling, Earth-Sun distance modeling and solar constant estimation uncertainty), atmospheric properties uncertainty (such as aerosol optical depth and integrated water vapor column estimation, among others, with specific effects depending on the clear sky model being used) and the intrinsic clear sky modeling error (which is model dependent).…”
Section: Dn I = (Ghi − Dh I) Sin α (9)mentioning
confidence: 99%