26th Joint Propulsion Conference 1990
DOI: 10.2514/6.1990-2024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nozzle design optimization by method-of-characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is truncated 50% considering the nozzle gained is too long. The study [5] shows the truncation can limit the length and weight of the nozzle without affecting the nozzle performance seriously. The geometric parameters of the nozzle are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is truncated 50% considering the nozzle gained is too long. The study [5] shows the truncation can limit the length and weight of the nozzle without affecting the nozzle performance seriously. The geometric parameters of the nozzle are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asymmetric single expansion ramp nozzle is applied for thrust generation. The nozzle expansion ramp is defined by a nonparametric spline derived from a method of characteristics for a horizontal exit flow angle [30]. The coordinates of the flaps trailing edge are defined by the combustor outflow cross section and the overall length of the engine and therefore are not independent variables.…”
Section: Engine Configurations and Computational Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The focus often was on optimization of nozzle geometry with direct design methods like the method of characteristics. 2–7 Attempts of nozzle contour optimization were carried out multiple times by means of design methods by analysis including multi-physics CFD simulations together with numerical optimization tools, so called multidisciplinary optimization, but only with respect to the flow inside the nozzle. 812 with respect to simple fabrication, a conical C-D nozzle is chosen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%