2013
DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NRAS and BRAF Mutations in Cutaneous Melanoma and the Association with MC1R Genotype: Findings from Spanish and Austrian Populations

Abstract: There is increasing epidemiologic and molecular evidence that cutaneous melanomas arise through multiple causal pathways. To further define the pathways to melanoma, we explored the relationship between germline and somatic mutations in a series of melanomas collected from 134 Spanish and 241 Austrian patients. Tumor samples were analyzed for melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) variants and mutations in the BRAF and NRAS genes. Detailed clinical data were systematically collected from patients. We found that NRAS-m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
33
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If these results are confirmed in future studies, this will be consistent with the “common genetic origin” hypothesis since melanomas on this location have been associated with naevus-associated gene polymorphisms (43, 44), MC1R (the red hair colour gene) status, and somatic BRAF mutations (45). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…If these results are confirmed in future studies, this will be consistent with the “common genetic origin” hypothesis since melanomas on this location have been associated with naevus-associated gene polymorphisms (43, 44), MC1R (the red hair colour gene) status, and somatic BRAF mutations (45). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, studies conducted in North Carolina and Australia found no association between carriage of MC1R variants and BRAFmutant melanoma [93,228], while a study conducted in Germany found BRAFmutant melanoma to be less frequent among MC1R variant carriers than non-carriers, with the effect dependent entirely upon the nodular subtype [212]. A recent study in Spanish and Austrian populations found no association of MC1R status with BRAF-mutant melanoma across all tumor sites but a non-significant association for truncal melanoma and a significant inverse association between MC1R variants and BRAF-mutant melanomas of the head and neck [92]. Additional larger-perhaps international-studies seem necessary to provide any real understanding of the association of MC1R variants with BRAF-mutant melanoma in the context of possible anatomic site and histologic subtype dependencies.…”
Section: Sun Exposure and Tumor Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most studies note indirect evidence, such as associations between mutations with anatomic site, to infer a relationship to UV exposure; however, body site alone may influence mutational status. Studies examining sun exposure questionnaire data found that BRAF-mutant melanoma was associated with high early-life ambient [228] and individual self-reported childhood sun exposure [144] and was less likely to occur in people with high cumulative sun exposure [92]. However, these results remain to be replicated.…”
Section: Sun Exposure and Tumor Subtypesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…DNA was isolated using Qiagen DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen) with additional proteinase K digestion at 55°C for 48 h (ref. 49).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutations at codon 600 of BRAF p.V600 and codon 61 of NRAS p.Q61 in DNA from FFPE samples were detected with single base extension or allele-specific assays using the iPLEX genotyping format (Sequenom) 49 . For DNA from fresh frozen tumour tissues, PCR and Sanger sequencing as described were used to detect mutations in the TERT promoter, BRAF, NRAS and additionally in CDKN2A.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%