2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NREM sleep instability changes following rapid maxillary expansion in children with obstructive apnea sleep syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
37
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, we did not compare sleep architecture parameters with those of a control group, in order to better understand such discrepancies. We cannot establish whether these differences are influenced by aging, or are an indirect sign of incomplete recovery from OSAS, as we reported in a previous investigation on sleep architecture and arousals in the same group of children treated with RME [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Unfortunately, we did not compare sleep architecture parameters with those of a control group, in order to better understand such discrepancies. We cannot establish whether these differences are influenced by aging, or are an indirect sign of incomplete recovery from OSAS, as we reported in a previous investigation on sleep architecture and arousals in the same group of children treated with RME [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Associated with the occurrence of abnormal nocturnal respiratory events are sleep fragmentations caused by repetitive arousals and sleep instability due to reduction in the amount of slow-wave activity (23). In children, the beneficial effects of the orthodontic expansion treatment of the maxilla include both normalisation of sleep architecture and improvement of SDB (11,(21)(22)(23). However, in adults, the effects of the treatment on sleep and nocturnal respiration are far less known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third cycle had significant interaction between treatment and period (P = 0Á018). Overall, for high beta activity (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32), there was a significant interaction between treatment, cycle and period (P < 0Á001). The third cycle had significant interaction between treatment and period (P = 0Á025).…”
Section: Sleep Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A1 phase frequency of CAP (a protective reaction of the sleeping brain) has been shown to be reduced in children with SDB92 and A2 phases (mild cortical activation) increased among children with OSAS compared with controls 93. A rebound in A1 indices was observed among children with OSAS 1 year after rapid maxillary expander treatment; however, other measures such as A2 frequency remained unchanged 94. The functional significance of these differences is yet to be determined as is the association with neurocognitive performance and behavior.…”
Section: Possible Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 96%