2018
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NRSF/REST levels are decreased in cholangiocellular carcinoma but not hepatocellular carcinoma compared with normal liver tissues: A tissue microarray study

Abstract: Abstract. The transcription factor neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF), also termed repressor element 1-silencing transcription factor (REST), has been previously demonstrated to repress the expression of neuronal genes in non-neuronal cells, facilitating the controlled development and organization of nerve tissue. However, previous studies have reported NRSF/REST to be upregulated or downregulated in multiple types of carcinoma. Liver diseases are a major global health concern, with cirrhosis and liver … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, however, its main localization is in the cytoplasm, relevant for liver cancer cell proliferation. In this case, the oncogenic effect of cytoplasmic REST is paradox and not yet explained [56].…”
Section: Cancersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In all cases, however, its main localization is in the cytoplasm, relevant for liver cancer cell proliferation. In this case, the oncogenic effect of cytoplasmic REST is paradox and not yet explained [56].…”
Section: Cancersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…REST gene was marginally studied in liver cancer. There is only a handful of studies discussing its expression and alternative splicing status in cancer [ 44 , 45 ]. Our results indicated its importance in maintaining chromatin accessibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After immunohistochemical staining, images were captured with a DS-Ri2 digital camera (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) mounted to a CX41 Nikon microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The staining was scored according to the previously described 4-point system (score 0–3) [23,24] by a pathologist (double-blinded) as follows: score 3, dark staining that is easily visible and present in >50% of cells; score 2, focal areas of dark staining (<50% of cells) or moderate staining of >50% of cells; score 1, focal moderate staining in <50% of cells or pale staining in any proportion of cells not easily observable at low power; and score 0, none of the aforementioned. A high level of expression was defined as a score of 2–3 and low level of expression was defined as a score of 0–1, as described previously.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%