2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2022.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NTRK-fusions in pediatric thyroid tumors: Current state and future perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the webserver for fusion integrative analysis FPIA 37 shows that for each NTRK gene, considering 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program data, breaks occur at different exonic, splicing (within 2-bp of a splicing junction), non-coding RNA (overlaps a transcript without coding annotation in the gene definition), intronic, and intergenic locations (Fig 4A). The literature revealed 127 different fusion partners 5,25,34,35,38,39 from which 90 (70.9%) were associated with adult tumor histologies, 22 (17.3%) were restricted to pediatric tumors, and 15 (11.8%) are shared by both settings (Fig 4B). When examining the recombinational background of each fusion partner, 78% of them translocate with all NTRK members in adult tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the webserver for fusion integrative analysis FPIA 37 shows that for each NTRK gene, considering 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program data, breaks occur at different exonic, splicing (within 2-bp of a splicing junction), non-coding RNA (overlaps a transcript without coding annotation in the gene definition), intronic, and intergenic locations (Fig 4A). The literature revealed 127 different fusion partners 5,25,34,35,38,39 from which 90 (70.9%) were associated with adult tumor histologies, 22 (17.3%) were restricted to pediatric tumors, and 15 (11.8%) are shared by both settings (Fig 4B). When examining the recombinational background of each fusion partner, 78% of them translocate with all NTRK members in adult tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Moreover, fusions presented a certain tissue tropism: pediatric thyroid tumors predominantly involved NTRK1 and NTRK3, whereas CNS tumors primarily have fusions associated with NTRK2. 25,35,36 In this regard, as more tumors are being studied for fusions, higher the number of partners and different breakpoints. Indeed, the webserver for fusion integrative analysis FPIA 37 shows that for each NTRK gene, considering 33 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas Program data, breaks occur at different exonic, splicing (within 2-bp of a splicing junction), non-coding RNA (overlaps a transcript without coding annotation in the gene definition), intronic, and intergenic locations ( Response rates observed in our study were similar to the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TRK inhibitors Entrectinib and Larotrectinib have been recommended by the FDA for use in both pediatric and adult tumors with NTRK fusions. Larotrectinib is selective for TrkA, TrkB and TrkC, whereas Entrectinib also inhibits ROS1 and ALK [ 125 , 126 ]. Selpercatinib has shown efficacy in RET fusion-positive pediatric PTCs [ 83 ].…”
Section: Targeted Therapy In Pediatric Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the acquisition of drug resistance is a major obstacle. To overcome this, trials of novel agents such as Selitrectinib (LOXO-195), Repotrectinib (TPX-0 0 05) and Taletrectinib (DS-6051b) are currently underway [ 126 ].…”
Section: Targeted Therapy In Pediatric Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%