Day 2 Wed, February 05, 2020 2020
DOI: 10.2118/199726-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuances and Frequently Asked Questions in Field-Scale Hydraulic Fracture Modeling

Abstract: Hydraulic fracturing and reservoir simulation are used by operators in shale to optimize design parameters such as well spacing, cluster spacing, and injection schedule. In this paper, we address ‘freqently asked questions’ that we encounter when working on hydraulic fracture modeling projects with operators. First, we discuss three high-level topics: (1) data-driven and physics-based models, (2) the modeling workflow, and (3) planar-fracture modeling versus ‘complex fracture network’ modeling. Next, we addres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the fracture in the schematic figure is rectangular; however, in this work the 3D fracture geometry (2D extent plus variable aperture) from GEOS is used. Note the plane of symmetry at the fracture face (this is a 1 2 -space problem). No-flow boundaries at the left and right edges imply that the well is part of a series of parallel wells with spacing X max .…”
Section: Preliminary Producton Simulations With Tough+mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the fracture in the schematic figure is rectangular; however, in this work the 3D fracture geometry (2D extent plus variable aperture) from GEOS is used. Note the plane of symmetry at the fracture face (this is a 1 2 -space problem). No-flow boundaries at the left and right edges imply that the well is part of a series of parallel wells with spacing X max .…”
Section: Preliminary Producton Simulations With Tough+mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, reservoir modeling tools have been limited to a subset of processes operating at a specific scale in order to reduce algorithmic complexity and increase computational performance. For example, fast-running models for hydraulic fracture design-such as ResFrac [1]-typically focus on flow and mechanics at larger scales in order to provide a rapid solution. Reservoir production models-such as Eclipse [2] or CMG-STARS/GEM [3]-solve for multiphase flow, with somewhat limited consideration of chemistry and mechanics, in order to achieve a timely solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Historically, reservoir modeling tools have been limited to a subset of processes operating at a specific scale in order to reduce algorithmic complexity and increase computational performance. For example, fast-running models for hydraulic fracture design -such as ResFrac (McClure et al, 2020) typically focus on flow and mechanics at larger scales in order to provide a rapid solution. Reservoir production models -such as Eclipse (Kempka et al, 2013) or CMG-STARS/GEM (CMG, 2018) -solve for multiphase flow, with somewhat limited consideration of chemistry and mechanics, in order to achieve a timely solution.…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One big handicap of type-curves generated with data analytics is that these are based on the physical attributes of past well completion technology [7,8]. In practice, most operators will continually want to adapt their well design to improve recovery factors by altering the well spacing fracture treatment parameters (such as fracture spacing, fracture heights, fracture half-length, well length) of future infill well locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%