2012
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuchal translucency screening in triplets: Down syndrome risk calculation taking account of between‐fetus correlations

Abstract: Fetus-specific Down syndrome risks in triplets should be calculated using its own NT value and that in the other fetuses, chorionicity, and method of conception.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many groups have reported on the variable efficacy and additional limitations of screening tests in multiples as there is commonly confusion as to which fetus an abnormal screening test is attributable. [9][10][11][12][13] We, and a small number of other groups who developed and have extensive experience in chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in both singletons and multiples, began to routinely offer CVS prior to reduction in the late 1990s, which we believe offers a significant opportunity to improve the likelihood of healthy families for these patients. [14][15][16] Because of the advent of prenatal diagnosis techniques with the development of amniocentesis and ultrasound 40 years ago and CVS 30 years ago, their use (abuse) merely for the identification of gender with termination of normal females was a consistent although minor component of cases in the United States and many Western European countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many groups have reported on the variable efficacy and additional limitations of screening tests in multiples as there is commonly confusion as to which fetus an abnormal screening test is attributable. [9][10][11][12][13] We, and a small number of other groups who developed and have extensive experience in chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in both singletons and multiples, began to routinely offer CVS prior to reduction in the late 1990s, which we believe offers a significant opportunity to improve the likelihood of healthy families for these patients. [14][15][16] Because of the advent of prenatal diagnosis techniques with the development of amniocentesis and ultrasound 40 years ago and CVS 30 years ago, their use (abuse) merely for the identification of gender with termination of normal females was a consistent although minor component of cases in the United States and many Western European countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is still true for most FR providers. Many groups have reported on the variable efficacy and additional limitations of screening tests in multiples as there is commonly confusion as to which fetus an abnormal screening test is attributable . We, and a small number of other groups who developed and have extensive experience in chorionic villus sampling (CVS) in both singletons and multiples, began to routinely offer CVS prior to reduction in the late 1990s, which we believe offers a significant opportunity to improve the likelihood of healthy families for these patients …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%