2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2009.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nuclear and chloroplast DNA-based phylogenies of Chrysanthemoides Tourn. ex Medik. (Calenduleae; Asteraceae) reveal extensive incongruence and generic paraphyly, but support the recognition of infraspecific taxa in C. monilifera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incongruence between the two works can be explained by the use of two different genomes (chloroplast and nuclear) as well as the difference in the number of markers. The discordance between nuclear and plastid phylogenies has been largely documented for different plant groups (Soltis & Kuzoff, 1995; Yu et al, 2013) including several members of the Asteraceae family (Fehrer et al, 2007; Barker et al, 2009; Pelser et al, 2010), and we agree on the necessity of a combined approach to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the family. The extensive history of polyploidy (Barker et al, 2008; Smissen et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2016) and hybridization events at the beginning of the diversification of several Asteraceae lineages may also contribute to the incongruence between phylogenies generated by different types of markers (Pelser et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The incongruence between the two works can be explained by the use of two different genomes (chloroplast and nuclear) as well as the difference in the number of markers. The discordance between nuclear and plastid phylogenies has been largely documented for different plant groups (Soltis & Kuzoff, 1995; Yu et al, 2013) including several members of the Asteraceae family (Fehrer et al, 2007; Barker et al, 2009; Pelser et al, 2010), and we agree on the necessity of a combined approach to reconstruct the evolutionary history of the family. The extensive history of polyploidy (Barker et al, 2008; Smissen et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2016) and hybridization events at the beginning of the diversification of several Asteraceae lineages may also contribute to the incongruence between phylogenies generated by different types of markers (Pelser et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…mono based on microsatellite or SSR markers [24]. This discrepancy based on different types of molecular markers may be caused by incomplete lineage sorting and shared ancestral polymorphism and/or gene introgression between closely related species, as well as limited genetic information revealed by low evolutionary rate of the plastid genome [5962]. It may be necessary to use highly variable SSRs or genome-wide SNPs to confirm our current results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Our analyses indicate that once the reduction to a single seed takes place, the resulting achene‐like fruit becomes “locked in,” as there were no inferred gains of multi‐seededness or dehiscence after the loss of these characters. In fact, the only transition out of the achene fruit type involves the gain of fleshiness, which occurred only a few times and only in particular species of Asteraceae (Barker et al ). These “fleshy achenes” reflect shifts in dispersal syndrome, where birds, as opposed to abiotic factors are the primary dispersal agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%